Effect of Molecular Size of Pegylated Peptide on the Pharmacokinetics and Tumor Targeting in Lymphoma-Bearing Mice

Purpose: Rapid blood and body clearances have hampered effective tumor targeting by small molecules. We used branched poly(ethylene glycol) (pegylated) polymers ( M r 40,000, M r 70,000, M r 100,000, and M r 150,000) conjugated to tumor-specific and control peptides to assess the effect of both mole...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical cancer research 2003-09, Vol.9 (10), p.3854s-64S
Hauptverfasser: DeNardo, Sally J, Yao, Zhengsheng, Lam, Kit S, Song, Aimin, Burke, Patricia A, Mirick, Gary R, Lamborn, Kathleen R, O'Donnell, Robert T, DeNardo, Gerald L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: Rapid blood and body clearances have hampered effective tumor targeting by small molecules. We used branched poly(ethylene glycol) (pegylated) polymers ( M r 40,000, M r 70,000, M r 100,000, and M r 150,000) conjugated to tumor-specific and control peptides to assess the effect of both molecular weight and tumor specificity on pharmacokinetics and biodistribution. Experimental Design: Pegylated specific lymphoma-binding peptide and control peptide (containing stereoisomers of proline and aspartate) were synthesized, radiolabeled with 111 In, fractionated by size, and injected into Raji lymphoma-bearing athymic mice (4–6 mice/group). Pharmacokinetics were followed for 2 days to evaluate effects of specificity and molecular size on blood clearance, body clearance, and biodistribution. Results: As molecular size increased, blood and body clearances decreased ( P < 0.001). The effect of molecular size on blood clearance was not altered by ligand binding specificity ( P = 0.21), with t 1/2 ranging from 5.4 h ( M r 40,000) to 17.7 h ( M r 150,000). However, ligand specificity did alter body clearance, with pegylated control peptides clearing the body more slowly than pegylated specific peptides [ P = 0.03; range, 19.1–91.3 h (specific peptides) versus 23.6–115.7 h (control peptides)]. At 24 h, there was more uptake of specific versus control pegylated peptides in tumor, liver, and marrow, but there was less uptake in kidneys, with a more pronounced difference for the higher molecular weight peptides ( P < 0.01). Conclusions: These results demonstrate that the pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of peptides and resultant uptake in tumor and normal tissues can be altered by both molecular size and ligand specificity, with molecular size affecting pharmacokinetics and organ uptake in a predictable manner.
ISSN:1078-0432
1557-3265