Emergency peripartum hysterectomy and associated risk factors

OBJECTIVE: Peripartum hysterectomy at Los Angeles County-University of Southern California Medical Center was reviewed and associated risk factors were identified. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective descriptive and cohort analysis from January 1985 to June 1990 was carried out. Adjusted relative risks for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 1993-03, Vol.168 (3), p.879-883
Hauptverfasser: Stanco, Lorraine M., Schrimmer, David B., Paul, Richard H., Mishell, Jr, Daniel R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVE: Peripartum hysterectomy at Los Angeles County-University of Southern California Medical Center was reviewed and associated risk factors were identified. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective descriptive and cohort analysis from January 1985 to June 1990 was carried out. Adjusted relative risks for hysterectomy with 95% confidence intervals for identified risk factors were calculated where possible. RESULTS: There were 123 cases of emergency peripartum hysterectomy (incidence of 1 .3/1000 births). Indications for hysterectomy were primarily placenta accreta ( n = 61), uterine atony ( n = 25), unspecified uterine bleeding ( n = 19), and uterine rupture ( n = 14). The relative risk of emergency hysterectomy was 95.5 (95% confidence interval 66.7 to 136.9) for cesarean delivery, 10.78 (95% confidence interval 7,56 to 15.37) for prior cesarean delivery, and 97,29 (95% confidence interval 70.28 to 134.70) for placenta previa. CONCLUSIONS: Cesarean delivery, prior cesarean delivery, placenta previa, placenta accreta, and uterine atony were identified risk factors for emergency peripartum hysterectomy.
ISSN:0002-9378
1097-6868
DOI:10.1016/S0002-9378(12)90838-8