Should we monitor peak expiratory flow rates or record symptoms with a simple diary in the management of asthma?
Background: Various means of monitoring asthma severity have been proposed to reduce morbidity and mortality rates. We compared two means of assessing asthma flare-ups: monitoring peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and keeping a symptom diary. Methods: This was a crossover randomized study. After a 2-...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of allergy and clinical immunology 1993-03, Vol.91 (3), p.702-709 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background:
Various means of monitoring asthma severity have been proposed to reduce morbidity and mortality rates. We compared two means of assessing asthma flare-ups: monitoring peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and keeping a symptom diary.
Methods:
This was a crossover randomized study. After a 2-week baseline period during which spirometry and PC
20 methacholine were assessed, subjects were asked to record either PEFRs or to keep a symptom diary morning and evening for 6 months; a second baseline assessment separated the two periods. Subjects were asked to contact the study coordinator if the following occurred: (1) in the period of PEFR monitoring, daily fluctuations in PEFR were >20% or the absolute value fell to |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0091-6749 1097-6825 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0091-6749(93)90189-M |