Mixed-bandwidth acquisitions: Signal-to-noise ratio and signal-to-noise efficiency

Purpose To evaluate signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and SNR efficiency in mixed‐bandwidth acquisition (MBA). SNR efficiency describes the achievable SNR per unit time and is a basic aspect in clinical applications to optimize work flow. Materials and Methods Corresponding simulations were performed and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2010-10, Vol.32 (4), p.997-1002
Hauptverfasser: Choli, Morwan, Jakob, Peter M., Loeffler, Ralf B., Hillenbrand, Claudia M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To evaluate signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and SNR efficiency in mixed‐bandwidth acquisition (MBA). SNR efficiency describes the achievable SNR per unit time and is a basic aspect in clinical applications to optimize work flow. Materials and Methods Corresponding simulations were performed and predictions of the theory verified in phantom experiments and volunteers. Specifically, SNR and SNR efficiencies were compared for an MBA fast low‐angle shot (MBA‐FLASH) sequence and traditional single‐bandwidth acquisitions. Results: MBAs result in an SNR penalty compared to single‐bandwidth acquisitions for a given sampling time. Furthermore, the nonuniform distribution of noise characteristics in k‐space introduced by MBA sequences caused potential changes in noise texture of the image. Conclusion Overall, the MBA‐FLASH imaging experiments in phantoms and healthy volunteers support the feasibility of using dual or multiple bandwidth acquisitions, which may be important in alternative imaging schemes that combine multiple acquisition techniques. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010;32:997–1002. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/jmri.22327