Clinical and cognitive response to extended-release methylphenidate (Medikinet®) in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Efficacy evaluation

Introduction The objective of the study was to assess the efficacy of extended-release methylphenidate (Mph-ER) (Medikinet®; MEDICE Arzneimittel Pütter GmbH & Co KG, Iserlohn, Germany) in the pediatric population with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD); a parallel analysis of the va...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Advances in therapy 2009-12, Vol.26 (12), p.1097-1110
Hauptverfasser: Fernández-Jaén, Alberto, Fernández-Mayoralas, Daniel Martín, Pardos, Alexandra, Calleja-Pérez, Beatriz, Muñoz Jareño, Nuria
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction The objective of the study was to assess the efficacy of extended-release methylphenidate (Mph-ER) (Medikinet®; MEDICE Arzneimittel Pütter GmbH & Co KG, Iserlohn, Germany) in the pediatric population with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD); a parallel analysis of the validity of various tools for monitoring short-term clinical response to treatment was made. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of 94 children with ADHD who received treatment with Mph-ER. The ADHD Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS) was used to assess clinical efficacy. The following neuropsychological tests were used to assess cognitive-attentional efficacy: the faces test, the D2 test, the Magallanes visual attention scale (EMAV; Escalas Magallanes de Attencion Visual), and the Conners’ Continuous Performance Test II (CPT-II). The ADHD-RS scale was completed by the parents at the time of diagnosis and after 3 months of treatment. The tests were taken by patients both without treatment and under the effects of treatment. The results of these variables were transformed into Z values for subsequent analysis. Results In all, 84% of the patients lowered their ADHD-RS score with Mph-ER. Regarding the neuropsychological tests, a significant change was seen when the results of patients without treatment were compared with their later results with treatment. When the order of test conditions was reversed (with and then without treatment), the CPT-II was the only test for which there was still a significant difference. Conclusion Mph-ER improved attention and self-control from a clinical and cognitive point of view. Of those studied, the CPT-II was the most effective neuropsychological test for monitoring efficacy of Mph in the short-term.
ISSN:0741-238X
1865-8652
DOI:10.1007/s12325-009-0083-9