Computed tomography (CT) of abdominal aortic aneurysms: determination of longitudinal extent

The aim of this study was to evaluate computed tomography (CT) in the assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms with particular reference to their longitudinal extent. Twenty‐nine patients were examined by CT, 21 of whom came to surgery. Sixteen of these 21 patients were also examined by ultrasound....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of surgery 1981-01, Vol.68 (1), p.47-50
Hauptverfasser: Dixon, A. K., Springall, R. G., Fry, I. Kelsey, Taylor, G. W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The aim of this study was to evaluate computed tomography (CT) in the assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms with particular reference to their longitudinal extent. Twenty‐nine patients were examined by CT, 21 of whom came to surgery. Sixteen of these 21 patients were also examined by ultrasound. At CT the relation of the aneurysm to the renal arteries proximally and the bifurcation distally was noted, along with the definition of the aortic outline. At subsequent surgery the longitudinal relations of the aneurysm and evidence of localized stretching of or leakage from the sac were assessed by an observer without knowledge of the CT scan report. Correct extent of the aneurysm in relation to the renal arteries was predicted by CT in 20 out of the 21 patients who underwent surgery. CT assessment with respect to the bifurcation was correct in 16. The CT findings proved correct in one patient with localized stretching of one part of the aneurysm and in one patient where leakage was occurring. CT scanning was found to be superior to ultrasound in our preoperative assessment of the superior extent of abdominal aortic aneurysms. CT is considered to be the investigation of first choice when evaluating an abdominal aortic aneurysm.
ISSN:0007-1323
1365-2168
DOI:10.1002/bjs.1800680116