New strategies in GVHD prophylaxis

Despite immunosuppressive therapy using cyclosporine (CsA) and prednisolone and methotrexate (MTX), the incidence for aGVHD grade II to IV after transplantation from HLA matched unrelated donors (MUD) is 78%, the incidence for grade III and IV 36%. Since GVHD contributes to morbidity and mortality a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bone marrow transplantation (Basingstoke) 2000-05, Vol.25 Suppl 2 (S2), p.S16-S19
Hauptverfasser: Kiehl, M G, Shipkova, M, Basara, N, Blau, W I, Fauser, A A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Despite immunosuppressive therapy using cyclosporine (CsA) and prednisolone and methotrexate (MTX), the incidence for aGVHD grade II to IV after transplantation from HLA matched unrelated donors (MUD) is 78%, the incidence for grade III and IV 36%. Since GVHD contributes to morbidity and mortality after MUD-BMT, a more effective prophylactic regimen is needed in order to prevent these transplant-associated complications. Recently, we described that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, CellCept), an immunosuppressive agent successfully used for the prevention of acute rejection in renal allograft recipients, can safely and effectively be used for the treatment of aGVHD in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Information on the i.v. formulation of mycophenolic acid (MPA) is not yet available. Here we report on the i.v. formulation of MMF in hematopoietic stem cell recipients. MMF is effective in the prophylaxis of acute GVHD after stem cell transplantation; the optimal dosage needs further investigation. At the present time the relevance of measurement of plasma MPA concentrations on MMF dosage is not yet understood and further evaluation is required.
ISSN:0268-3369
1476-5365
DOI:10.1038/sj.bmt.1702346