Expression of antimicrobial peptides in cutaneous infections after skin surgery

Summary Background  Increasing numbers of antibiotics have lost efficiency because of bacterial resistance. The consequences can be severe when surgical wounds become infected during postoperative care. Natural peptide antibiotics, the so‐called host defence peptides (HDPs), have been investigated s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of dermatology (1951) 2010-07, Vol.163 (1), p.121-127
Hauptverfasser: Kesting, M.R., Stoeckelhuber, M., Hölzle, F., Mücke, T., Neumann, K., Woermann, K., Jacobsen, F., Steinstraesser, L., Wolff, K.-D., Loeffelbein, D.J., Rohleder, N.H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Background  Increasing numbers of antibiotics have lost efficiency because of bacterial resistance. The consequences can be severe when surgical wounds become infected during postoperative care. Natural peptide antibiotics, the so‐called host defence peptides (HDPs), have been investigated since the 1990s in a search for alternative treatment strategies. HDPs build up a protection shield against pathological microorganisms, especially in human epithelium. The use of HDPs is currently being discussed as a new antimicrobial therapeutic strategy. Accordingly, a profound knowledge of the quantitative relationships of the effectors is essential. Objectives  To evaluate differences in HDP expression between postoperatively inflamed and healthy epithelium. Methods  Expression profiles of the genes encoding HDP human β‐defensin (hBD)‐1 (DEFB1, previously known as HBD‐1), hBD‐2 (DEFB4A, previously known as HBD‐2), hBD‐3 (DEFB103A, previously known as HBD‐3) and psoriasin (S100A7) were assessed in samples of surgical wound healing disorders (n = 27) and healthy epithelium (n = 16) by using real‐time polymerase chain reaction. Immunohistochemical staining was performed in the same samples. Results  A significant overexpression of DEFB4A (P 
ISSN:0007-0963
1365-2133
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09781.x