Physician Cost Profiling

To the Editor: Adams et al. (March 18 issue) 1 highlight problems in the use of claims data to profile physicians. We agree caution is necessary, but not all “profiling” is problematic. Three modifications can improve estimates: excluding infrequent and expensive items outside the physician's c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 2010-07, Vol.363 (5), p.491-493
Hauptverfasser: Luft, Harold S, Eaton, Laura J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To the Editor: Adams et al. (March 18 issue) 1 highlight problems in the use of claims data to profile physicians. We agree caution is necessary, but not all “profiling” is problematic. Three modifications can improve estimates: excluding infrequent and expensive items outside the physician's control, focusing on the primary care physician, and being condition-specific. For the profiling of resource use (i.e., cost) related to specific chronic illnesses, we recommend setting aside inpatient care. We evaluated data on 20,073 year-long episodes of care for patients with diabetes (excluding inpatient costs) in a large medical group in 2006, 2007, and 2008. Costs . . .
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJMc1004716