Physician Cost Profiling
To the Editor: Adams et al. (March 18 issue) 1 highlight problems in the use of claims data to profile physicians. We agree caution is necessary, but not all “profiling” is problematic. Three modifications can improve estimates: excluding infrequent and expensive items outside the physician's c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 2010-07, Vol.363 (5), p.491-493 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To the Editor:
Adams et al. (March 18 issue)
1
highlight problems in the use of claims data to profile physicians. We agree caution is necessary, but not all “profiling” is problematic. Three modifications can improve estimates: excluding infrequent and expensive items outside the physician's control, focusing on the primary care physician, and being condition-specific. For the profiling of resource use (i.e., cost) related to specific chronic illnesses, we recommend setting aside inpatient care.
We evaluated data on 20,073 year-long episodes of care for patients with diabetes (excluding inpatient costs) in a large medical group in 2006, 2007, and 2008. Costs . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJMc1004716 |