A Comparison of Outcomes for Interfascial and Intrafascial Nerve-sparing Radical Prostatectomy

A Comparison of Outcomes for Interfascial and Intrafascial Nerve-sparing Radical Prostatectomy

Objective To compare the outcome of intrafascial nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (nsEERPE) with interfascial (standard) nsEERPE. Methods Four-hundred patients underwent nsEERPE; 200 patients underwent bilateral intrafascial nsEERPE (group A) and 200 bilateral standard...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2010-09, Vol.76 (3), p.743-748
Hauptverfasser: Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe, Kallidonis, Panagiotis, Minh, Do, Dietel, Anja, Häfner, Tim, Rabenalt, Robert, Sakellaropoulos, George, Ganzer, Roman, Paasch, Uwe, Horn, Lars Christian, Liatsikos, Evangelos
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Fascia
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Postoperative Complications - prevention & control
Prostate - innervation
Prostatectomy - adverse effects
Prostatectomy - methods
Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery
Treatment Outcome
Urology
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To compare the outcome of intrafascial nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (nsEERPE) with interfascial (standard) nsEERPE. Methods Four-hundred patients underwent nsEERPE; 200 patients underwent bilateral intrafascial nsEERPE (group A) and 200 bilateral standard nsEERPE (group B). Tumor stages of T1 and T2a, prostate-specific antigen level
ISSN:0090-4295
1527-9995
DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.089