Narrow Band Imaging Cystoscopy Improves the Detection of Non–muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer
Objectives To determine whether narrow band imaging (NBI) improves detection of non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer over white-light imaging (WLI) cystoscopy. Methods We conducted a prospective, within-patient comparison on 103 consecutive procedures on 95 patients scheduled for (re-) transurethral r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2010-09, Vol.76 (3), p.658-663 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives To determine whether narrow band imaging (NBI) improves detection of non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer over white-light imaging (WLI) cystoscopy. Methods We conducted a prospective, within-patient comparison on 103 consecutive procedures on 95 patients scheduled for (re-) transurethral resection of a bladder tumor (84) or bladder biopsies (19) in the Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (September 2007-July 2009) and in the General Faculty Hospital, Prague (January 2009-July 2009). WLI and NBI cystoscopy were subsequently performed by different surgeons who independently indicated all tumors and suspect areas on a bladder diagram. The lesions identified were resected/biopsied and sent for histopathological examination. Number of patients with additional tumors detected by WLI and NBI were calculated; mean number of urothelial carcinomas (UCs) per patient, detection rates, and false-positive rates of both techniques were compared. Results A total of 78 patients had a confirmed UC; there were 226 tumors in total. In 28 (35.9%) of these patients, a total of 39 additional tumors (17.3%) (26pTa, 6pT1, 1pT2, 6pTis) were detected by NBI, whereas 4 additional tumors (1.8%) (1pTa, 1pT1, 2pTis) within 3 patients (2.9%) were detected by WLI. The mean (SD, range) number of UCs per patient identified by NBI was 2.1 (2.6, 0-15), vs 1.7 (2.3, 0-15) by WLI ( P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0090-4295 1527-9995 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.075 |