The increase in dural sac area is maintained at 2 years after X-stop implantation for the treatment of spinal stenosis with no significant alteration in lumbar spine range of movement

Abstract Background context The X-stop interspinous process decompression (IPD) device has been used effectively in the management of symptomatic spinal stenosis. This study examines the radiological outcomes at 2 years postoperatively after X-stop implantation. Purpose To measure the effect of X-st...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The spine journal 2010-09, Vol.10 (9), p.762-768
Hauptverfasser: Nandakumar, Anjali, MBBS, Clark, Natasha Annette, MRCS, Peehal, Jeetender Pal, MRCS, Bilolikar, Naval, MRCS, Wardlaw, Douglas, FRCS, ChM, Smith, Francis W., FRCR, FRCS, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background context The X-stop interspinous process decompression (IPD) device has been used effectively in the management of symptomatic spinal stenosis. This study examines the radiological outcomes at 2 years postoperatively after X-stop implantation. Purpose To measure the effect of X-stop IPD device on the dural sac and foraminal areas at 24 months postoperatively at instrumented level in symptomatic lumbar canal stenosis. We also aimed to assess its effect on change in lumbar spine movement. Study design Prospective observational study. Patient sample Forty-eight patients treated with X-stop had preoperative positional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, 40 of whom had 2 years postoperative positional MRI scans. Complete scans were available for 39 of these patients. Outcome measures Positional MRI scans were performed pre- and postoperatively. Measurements were done on these scans and are presented as the outcome measures. Methods All patients had a multipositional MRI scan preoperatively and at 6 and 24 months postoperatively. Foraminal area was measured in flexion and extension. Dural cross-sectional area was measured in standing erect and in sitting neutral, flexion, and extension (sitting) positions. The total range of movement (ROM) of the lumbar spine and individual segments was also measured. Results Complete scan data for 39 patients' scans were available. An increase in mean dural sac area was found in all positions. At 24 months after surgery, the mean dural sac area increased significantly in all four postures mentioned above. A small increase in mean foraminal area was noted, but this was not statistically significant. Mean anterior disc height reduced from 5.9 to 4.1 mm (p=.006) at 24 months at the instrumented level in single-level cases, from 7.7 to 6.1 mm (p=.032) in double-level cases caudally, and from 8.54 to 7.91 (p=.106) mm cranially. We hypothesize that the reduction in anterior disc heights could be a result of the natural progression of spinal stenosis with aging. There was no significant change in posterior disc heights at instrumented level or adjacent levels. The mean lumbar spine motion was 21.7° preoperatively and 23° at 24 months (p=.584) in single-level cases. This was 32.1° to 31.1° (p=.637) in double-level cases. There was no significant change in the individual segmental range of motion at instrumented and adjacent levels. Conclusion X-stop interspinous device remains effective in decompressing the steno
ISSN:1529-9430
1878-1632
DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2010.06.007