Comparison of different setups for fatigue testing of thin composite laminates in bending

After developing a damage model, validation of this model is a necessity. This validation should preferably be done under loading conditions which are different from the ones used for the development of the model. This study investigates whether a special design of a bending setup is suited for the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of fatigue 2009-06, Vol.31 (6), p.1095-1101
Hauptverfasser: De Baere, I., Van Paepegem, W., Degrieck, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:After developing a damage model, validation of this model is a necessity. This validation should preferably be done under loading conditions which are different from the ones used for the development of the model. This study investigates whether a special design of a bending setup is suited for the mechanical testing of thin fibre-reinforced composites with a low bending stiffness and the validation of fatigue material models, developed in uni-axial loading conditions. First, the disadvantages of a three-point bending setup for thin laminates are commented on. Then, a four-point bending setup is discussed, for which interestingly enough, the finite-element model can be simplified. Clamped supports are added to decrease the midspan displacement. This is followed by the discussion of the clamped three-point bending setup. It may be concluded that the clamped three-point bending setup is very promising for experimental work, since it increases the measured loads and decreases the midspan displacement with respect to the regular three-point bending setup, although further modification of the setup is necessary to avoid slipping in the grips. The material used for this study was a carbon fabric-reinforced polyphenylene sulphide.
ISSN:0142-1123
1879-3452
DOI:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.05.011