Thermal expansion of EB-PVD yttria stabilized zirconia

Yttria stabilized zirconia (YSZ) layers, suited for thermal barrier coatings (TBCs) in turbine engines, were produced by electron-beam physical vapour deposition (EB-PVD) on metallic (Ni-based alloys) ceramic (Al 2O 3) substrates (typically at 1000 °C) using ingot compositions of about 4 mol% Y 2O 3...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the European Ceramic Society 2010-09, Vol.30 (12), p.2491-2496
Hauptverfasser: Ochrombel, R., Schneider, J., Hildmann, B., Saruhan, B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Yttria stabilized zirconia (YSZ) layers, suited for thermal barrier coatings (TBCs) in turbine engines, were produced by electron-beam physical vapour deposition (EB-PVD) on metallic (Ni-based alloys) ceramic (Al 2O 3) substrates (typically at 1000 °C) using ingot compositions of about 4 mol% Y 2O 3–ZrO 2. Employing powdered samples, removed from the surface of the as-deposited YSZ layers, precision X-ray diffraction data sets were recorded between 60 and 900 °C and the lattice parameters of the metastable, tetragonal (t′) and the cubic (c) phases were refined using Rietveld's method. It was unambiguously verified that phase (c) was present in all investigated samples as a minority phase already in the as-deposited state. The thermal expansion coefficients of the tetragonal phase (t′) ( α 11 = 9.3(2) × 10 −6 K −1, α 33 = 10.8(1) × 10 −6 K −1) and the cubic phase (c) ( α 11 = 8.5(2) × 10 −6 K −1) were evaluated from the refined temperature dependent lattice parameter values of this study, and turned out to be close to each other, but significantly different from the coefficient of the monoclinic phase (m) ( α 11 = 9.0 × 10 −6 K −1, α 22 = 1.2 × 10 −6 K −1, α 33 = 11.9 × 10 −6 K −1, α 13 = 0.0 × 10 −6 K −1), which was derived from temperature dependent lattice parameter measurements published by Touloukian et al. 5 The expansion coefficient of the monoclinic phase (m) exhibited a very pronounced anisotropy in contrast to the tetragonal phases (t′) and (t). Our values for (t′) and (c) were in excellent agreement with that of other tetragonal and cubic phases from the literature with quite different Y 2O 3 contents.
ISSN:0955-2219
1873-619X
DOI:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.05.008