Comparative study of two lead-free piezoceramics using diffraction techniques
A comparative study of two distinct lead‐free piezoceramics, (Bi0.5Na0.5TiO3)0.92–(BaTiO3)0.06–(K0.5Na0.5NbO3)0.02 and (Bi0.5Na0.5TiO3)0.94–(BaTiO3)0.05–(K0.5Na0.5NbO3)0.01, termed 92‐06‐02 and 94‐05‐01, respectively, is presented. The samples were investigated by complementary diffraction technique...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied crystallography 2010-08, Vol.43 (4), p.805-810 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A comparative study of two distinct lead‐free piezoceramics, (Bi0.5Na0.5TiO3)0.92–(BaTiO3)0.06–(K0.5Na0.5NbO3)0.02 and (Bi0.5Na0.5TiO3)0.94–(BaTiO3)0.05–(K0.5Na0.5NbO3)0.01, termed 92‐06‐02 and 94‐05‐01, respectively, is presented. The samples were investigated by complementary diffraction techniques, namely X‐ray, neutron and electron diffraction. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and powder diffraction experiments clearly revealed the presence of both rhombohedral and tetragonal phases in space groups R3c and P4bm, respectively. Superlattice reflections observed in the diffraction patterns were used to identify the two phases. It was found that sample 92‐06‐02, with a high proportion of the nonpolar tetragonal phase, shows a grainy contrast, whereas specimen 94‐05‐01 features domain‐like contrast, related to a higher rhombohedral phase fraction. The combination of local scale analyses via TEM with X‐ray and neutron diffraction provides the experimental basis for further structural investigations. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1600-5767 0021-8898 1600-5767 |
DOI: | 10.1107/S0021889810015980 |