Effects of disopyramide on systemic and coronary hemodynamics and myocardial metabolism in patients with coronary artery disease: Comparison with lidocaine

In two groups, each comprising 10 patients with advanced coronary artery disease, disopyramide, 2 mg/kg over a period of 5 minutes, or lidocaine, 100 mg as a bolus dose, was injected intravenously. Disopyramide increased diastolic and mean arterial pressures significantly because of its vasoconstric...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of cardiology 1980-09, Vol.46 (3), p.469-475
Hauptverfasser: Kötter, Volker, Linderer, Thomas, Schröder, Rolf
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In two groups, each comprising 10 patients with advanced coronary artery disease, disopyramide, 2 mg/kg over a period of 5 minutes, or lidocaine, 100 mg as a bolus dose, was injected intravenously. Disopyramide increased diastolic and mean arterial pressures significantly because of its vasoconstrictive properties. Cardiac index decreased from 3.7 ± 0.3 to 3.2 ±0.1 liters/min per m 2 at 10 minutes and to 3.1 ± 0.2 30 minutes after the injection was begun. After lidocaine no changes in hemodynamic variables were observed. Disopyramide revealed potent coronary constrictive activity, whereas lidocaine was a mild coronary vasodilator. Coronary blood flow increased significantly from 68.2 ± 4.3 ml/ min × 100 g to 74.8 ± 4.1 directly after injection of 100 mg lidocaine and to 75.5 ± 5.0 25 to 30 minutes later. Disopyramide decreased coronary blood flow significantly from 73.8 ± 3.8 to 67.8 ± 2.7 ml/ min × 100 mg during the 5 minute period after drug infusion. Coronary vascular resistance increased very significantly from 0.94 ± 0.1 to 1.14 ± 0.1 units. Because of an extreme increase in the arterial-coronary sinus oxygen difference, myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO 2) increased at the same time from 9.9 ± 0.6 to 10.6 ± 0.5 ml/ min × 100 g. At 25 to 30 minutes after the start of the dlsopyramide infusion MVO 2 increased significantly to 11.9 ± 0.6 because the coronary blood flow increased to 79.1 ± 2.8. However, the arterial-coronary sinus oxygen difference remained significantly elevated and coronary vascular resistance declined only moderately. Myocardial lactate extraction did not change. Apparently a metabolism-induced dilatation in coronary vasculature actually overcomes the vasoconstriction by disopyramide and prevents serious myocardial ischemia, but a vasoconstrictive effect of disopyramide is still present. The potent coronary constrictive activity of intravenous disopyramide in the presence of increased myocardial oxygen need may be hazardous in specific clinical situations.
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/0002-9149(80)90017-X