Studies on the Nuclear Binding of Steroid Hormone-Receptor Complex; Characteristics of Binding of Nuclei from Fetal Rat Liver to 3H-Dexamethasone-Liver Cytoplasmic Receptor Complex

Binding of 3H-dexamethasone (Dex)-rat liver cytoplasmic receptor complex to nuclei from fetal rat livers in vitro exhibited a high-affinity and saturable nature (Kd=1.5×10-M, maximal binding sites=470 fmole/mg DNA), and the binding was inhibited competitively by prior injection of Dex in vivo. While...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Endocrinologia Japonica 1979, Vol.26(6), pp.679-685
Hauptverfasser: ICHII, SHOGO, MURAKAMI, NORIKO
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Binding of 3H-dexamethasone (Dex)-rat liver cytoplasmic receptor complex to nuclei from fetal rat livers in vitro exhibited a high-affinity and saturable nature (Kd=1.5×10-M, maximal binding sites=470 fmole/mg DNA), and the binding was inhibited competitively by prior injection of Dex in vivo. While binding of 3H-Dex-receptor complex to nuclei from adult rat liver was in low affinity and unsaturable, and injection of Dex prior to the sacrifice of animals did not influence the nuclear binding to 3H Dex-receptor complex in vitro. Differential salt-extraction with KCl solution of the nuclear bound3H-Dex receptor complex revealed the presence of salt-extractable and residual forms of bound receptors. The amount of the fraction extracted with 0.3M KCl reached its maximum at 10min after the start of incubation, while the 1.0M KClextractable and residual fractions reached their maximum plateaus after 30min of the incubation. Scatchard analysis revealed that the binding of the receptor complex to the 0.3M and 1.0M KCl fractions was saturable, while the residual fraction did not show any tendency of saturation under the experimental conditions employed in the present study. The results obtained in this work were compared to those which have been reported by other investigators.
ISSN:0013-7219
2185-6370
DOI:10.1507/endocrj1954.26.679