Failed pelvic pouch substituted by continent ileostomy
Objective The long‐term failure rate of ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) is 10–15%. When salvage surgery is unsuccessful, most surgeons prefer pouch excision with conventional ileostomy, thus sacrificing 40–50 cm of ileum. Conversion of a pelvic pouch to a continent ileostomy (CI, Kock pouch) is...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Colorectal disease 2010-07, Vol.12 (7Olie), p.e109-e113 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective The long‐term failure rate of ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) is 10–15%. When salvage surgery is unsuccessful, most surgeons prefer pouch excision with conventional ileostomy, thus sacrificing 40–50 cm of ileum. Conversion of a pelvic pouch to a continent ileostomy (CI, Kock pouch) is an alternative that preserves both the ileal surface and pouch properties. The aim of the study was to evaluate clinical outcome after the construction of a CI following a failed IPAA.
Method During 1984–2007, 317 patients were operated with IPAA at St Olavs Hospital and evaluated for failure, treatment and outcome. Seven patients with IPAA failure had CI. Four patients with IPAA failure referred from other hospitals underwent conversion to CI and are included in the final analysis.
Results Seven patients had a CI constructed from the transposing pelvic pouch and four had the pelvic pouch removed and a new continent pouch constructed from the distal ileum. Median follow up after conversion to CI was 7 years (0–17 years). Two CI had to be removed due to fistulae. One patient needed a revision of the nipple valve due to pouch loosening. At the end of follow‐up, 8 of the 11 patients were fully continent. One patient with Crohn’s disease had minor leakage.
Conclusion In patients with pelvic pouch failure, the possibility of conversion to CI should be presented to the patient as an alternative to pouch excision and permanent ileostomy. The advantage is the continence and possibly a better body image. Construction of a CI on a new ileal segment may be considered, but the consequences of additional small bowel loss and risk of malnutrition if the Kock pouch fails should be appraised. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1462-8910 1463-1318 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01856.x |