A multicenter international randomized phase III study comparing cisplatin in combination with irinotecan or etoposide in previously untreated small-cell lung cancer patients with extensive disease

This study compared irinotecan plus cisplatin (IP) with etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) in small-cell lung cancer patients with extensive disease. Patients were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin 80 mg/m2 and either irinotecan 65 mg/m2, days 1 and 8 or etoposide 100 mg/m2, days 1–3, every 3 weeks....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of oncology 2010-09, Vol.21 (9), p.1810-1816
Hauptverfasser: Zatloukal, P., Cardenal, F., Szczesna, A., Gorbunova, V., Moiseyenko, V., Zhang, X., Cisar, L., Soria, J.-C., Domine, M., Thomas, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study compared irinotecan plus cisplatin (IP) with etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) in small-cell lung cancer patients with extensive disease. Patients were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin 80 mg/m2 and either irinotecan 65 mg/m2, days 1 and 8 or etoposide 100 mg/m2, days 1–3, every 3 weeks. Baseline characteristics were balanced between patients receiving IP (N = 202) or EP (N = 203). Median overall survival was nonsignificantly superior for patients receiving IP versus EP, 10.2 versus 9.7 months [hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65–1.01, P = 0.06] and 1- and 2-year survival rates were 41.9% versus 38.9% and 16.3% versus 8.2%, respectively. Noninferiority of IP versus EP was established, upper bound of the 95% CI of HR 1.01 (prespecified margin IP/EP
ISSN:0923-7534
1569-8041
DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdq036