Theophylline Estimation — a Comparative Evaluation of a Gas Chromatographic Method and a High-Performance Liquid Chromatographic Method
A comparative evaluation of a gas-liquid chromatographic (GLC) assay and a high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) assay for the determination of plasma theophylline levels has been carried out. Both methods are reliable, accurate, and technically simple and appear to be specific for theophyl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of clinical biochemistry 1979-01, Vol.16 (1-6), p.254-258 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A comparative evaluation of a gas-liquid chromatographic (GLC) assay and a high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) assay for the determination of plasma theophylline levels has been carried out. Both methods are reliable, accurate, and technically simple and appear to be specific for theophylline. The HPLC system is more sensitive (sample volume 25 μl) than the GLC system (sample volume 500 μl) and is therefore suitable for the estimation of theophylline in microsamples. The HPLC system also has better precision (coefficient of variation: within-batch 2·0%, between-batch 3·0%) than the GLC system (coefficient of variation: within-batch 3·5%, between-batch 5·6%). Good correlation (r = 0·964) was found between plasma theophylline levels (n = 75, observed range 4–186 μmol/l) determined by each procedure. The results of this study indicate that, of the two systems investigated, HPLC is the method of choice. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0004-5632 1758-1001 |
DOI: | 10.1177/000456327901600165 |