Decreased brain serotonin transporter binding in the euthymic state of bipolar I but not bipolar II disorder: a SPECT study

Chou Y‐H, Wang S‐J, Lin C‐L, Mao W‐C, Lee S‐M, Liao M‐H. Decreased brain serotonin transporter binding in the euthymic state of bipolar I but not bipolar II disorder: a SPECT study.
Bipolar Disord 2010: 12: 312–318. © 2010 The Authors.
Journal compilation © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Objectives...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bipolar disorders 2010-05, Vol.12 (3), p.312-318
Hauptverfasser: Chou, Yuan-Hwa, Wang, Shyh-Jen, Lin, Chun-Lung, Mao, Wei-Chung, Lee, Shin-Min, Liao, Mei-Hsiu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Chou Y‐H, Wang S‐J, Lin C‐L, Mao W‐C, Lee S‐M, Liao M‐H. Decreased brain serotonin transporter binding in the euthymic state of bipolar I but not bipolar II disorder: a SPECT study.
Bipolar Disord 2010: 12: 312–318. © 2010 The Authors.
Journal compilation © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Objectives:  Previous positron emission tomography studies have demonstrated that serotonin transporter (SERT) binding in the midbrain is decreased in the depressive state of bipolar disorder (BD). The aim of this study was to assess SERT binding in the midbrain of patients in a euthymic state of BD. Methods:  Twenty‐eight healthy controls and 24 patients in a euthymic state of medicated BD were recruited. Euthymic state was defined as Montgomery‐Åsberg Depression Rating Scale scores < 10 and Young Mania Rating Scale scores < 7 within a consecutive eight‐week period. Single photon emission computed tomography with the radiotracer 123I‐ADAM was used to measure SERT binding in the midbrain. An equilibrium ratio model was used for data analysis. Specific uptake ratio (SUR), which represents availability of SERT binding in the midbrain, was the primary measurement outcome. Results:  The averaged SURs were not different between healthy controls and BD patients in euthymic state (p = 0.27). However, a three‐way ANCOVA analysis comparing SURs in healthy controls, bipolar I disorder (BD I) patients, and bipolar II disorder (BD II) patients, covarying education duration and sex, showed that the averaged SURs were significantly lower in BD I than BD II patients and healthy controls (p = 0.042). The decreased SURs in BD I patients were well correlated with duration of illness (R = −0.742, p = 0.014) only. Conclusions:  Our findings demonstrate that there is differential biological regulation in BD I and BD II patients after stable treatment, which may support the existence of a dichotomy in BD.
ISSN:1398-5647
1399-5618
DOI:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2010.00800.x