Dynamics of sperm DNA fragmentation in the swine: Ejaculate and temperature effects

The dynamics of sperm DNA fragmentation was examined in 16 boar ejaculates using the sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) test and a two-tail comet assay. The net sperm rich fraction was preserved at two different temperatures ( Trial 1: 15 °C, n = 10; Trial 2: 37 °C, n = 6) and sub-samples were taken e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Animal reproduction science 2010-06, Vol.119 (3), p.235-243
Hauptverfasser: Pérez-Llano, B., López-Fernández, C., García-Casado, P., Arroyo, F., Gosalbez, A., Sala, R., Gosálvez, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The dynamics of sperm DNA fragmentation was examined in 16 boar ejaculates using the sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) test and a two-tail comet assay. The net sperm rich fraction was preserved at two different temperatures ( Trial 1: 15 °C, n = 10; Trial 2: 37 °C, n = 6) and sub-samples were taken every day until a sperm motility of zero. Significant differences in the dynamics of DNA fragmentation were observed among the different ejaculates and also according to the storage temperature. After analyzing the dynamic response of the sperm DNA damage, when the sperm samples are incubated at 15 or 37 °C, each ejaculate could be classified and a considerable variation among individuals for an increase in DNA damage was observed. Thus, while in some ejaculates no rise in DNA fragmentation was observed, in others, the sperm DNA fragmentation process was triggered during the initial days of the experiment. In general, sperm incubation at 37 °C diminished sperm DNA quality. The two-tail comet assay indicated that at time zero existing DNA damage mainly consisted of double stranded DNA breakage. During storage, DNA damage affected one of the DNA strands until a second wave of DNA damage, in which there was both single and double stranded DNA damage.
ISSN:0378-4320
1873-2232
DOI:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.01.002