Odor selection, preferences and identification
69 college women were given samples of 8 perfumes and indicated whether they thought the perfume to be expensive or inexpensive and the odor to be pleasant or unpleasant. The mean percentage of correct estimations of perfume value was 55 (50% being chance identification) and the floral odor was iden...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied psychology 1949-04, Vol.33 (2), p.167-174 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 174 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 167 |
| container_title | Journal of applied psychology |
| container_volume | 33 |
| creator | Locke, Bernard Grimm, Charles H |
| description | 69 college women were given samples of 8 perfumes and indicated whether they thought the perfume to be expensive or inexpensive and the odor to be pleasant or unpleasant. The mean percentage of correct estimations of perfume value was 55 (50% being chance identification) and the floral odor was identified with 23.5% accuracy. There was a tendency to select expensive perfumes as being inexpensive and to attribute unpleasantness to odors thought to be costly. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/h0062514 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_74585321</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614245373</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a365t-8008c6290f8f740fd2c8a2887566851a7532e714df1aa8305befd79a3c8b5f3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10F9LwzAUBfAgiptT8BNIUREf7Ly3SZr0UcR_MNiLPoc0TbCja2vSPuzbm7GJIPh0H-6Pw-EQco4wR6Di_hMgzziyAzLFghYpSs4OyRQgw7QAhAk5CWEFgIwWcEwmKBEZF2JK5suq80mwjTVD3bV3Se-ts962xoZEt1VSV7Ydalcbvf2fkiOnm2DP9ndGPp6f3h9f08Xy5e3xYZFqmvMhlQDS5FkBTjrBwFWZkTqTUvA8lxy14DSzAlnlUGtJgZfWVaLQ1MiSO1rSGbnZ5fa--xptGNS6DsY2jW5tNwYlGJcxAyO8_ANX3ejb2E3lyDLGqaARXf2HMJZkOaKUUd3ulPFdCHEG1ft6rf1GIajtzOpn5kgv9oFjubbVL9zvGsH1Duheqz5sjPZDbRoblO4bRanKFOaCfgN6a4Bj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614245373</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Odor selection, preferences and identification</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Locke, Bernard ; Grimm, Charles H</creator><creatorcontrib>Locke, Bernard ; Grimm, Charles H</creatorcontrib><description>69 college women were given samples of 8 perfumes and indicated whether they thought the perfume to be expensive or inexpensive and the odor to be pleasant or unpleasant. The mean percentage of correct estimations of perfume value was 55 (50% being chance identification) and the floral odor was identified with 23.5% accuracy. There was a tendency to select expensive perfumes as being inexpensive and to attribute unpleasantness to odors thought to be costly.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1854</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0062514</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18114577</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Commerce ; Female ; Human ; Humans ; Odor Discrimination ; Odorants ; Old Medline ; Olfactory Perception ; Olfactory Stimulation</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied psychology, 1949-04, Vol.33 (2), p.167-174</ispartof><rights>1949 unknown</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a365t-8008c6290f8f740fd2c8a2887566851a7532e714df1aa8305befd79a3c8b5f3b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27846,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18114577$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Locke, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimm, Charles H</creatorcontrib><title>Odor selection, preferences and identification</title><title>Journal of applied psychology</title><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><description>69 college women were given samples of 8 perfumes and indicated whether they thought the perfume to be expensive or inexpensive and the odor to be pleasant or unpleasant. The mean percentage of correct estimations of perfume value was 55 (50% being chance identification) and the floral odor was identified with 23.5% accuracy. There was a tendency to select expensive perfumes as being inexpensive and to attribute unpleasantness to odors thought to be costly.</description><subject>Commerce</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Odor Discrimination</subject><subject>Odorants</subject><subject>Old Medline</subject><subject>Olfactory Perception</subject><subject>Olfactory Stimulation</subject><issn>0021-9010</issn><issn>1939-1854</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1949</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp10F9LwzAUBfAgiptT8BNIUREf7Ly3SZr0UcR_MNiLPoc0TbCja2vSPuzbm7GJIPh0H-6Pw-EQco4wR6Di_hMgzziyAzLFghYpSs4OyRQgw7QAhAk5CWEFgIwWcEwmKBEZF2JK5suq80mwjTVD3bV3Se-ts962xoZEt1VSV7Ydalcbvf2fkiOnm2DP9ndGPp6f3h9f08Xy5e3xYZFqmvMhlQDS5FkBTjrBwFWZkTqTUvA8lxy14DSzAlnlUGtJgZfWVaLQ1MiSO1rSGbnZ5fa--xptGNS6DsY2jW5tNwYlGJcxAyO8_ANX3ejb2E3lyDLGqaARXf2HMJZkOaKUUd3ulPFdCHEG1ft6rf1GIajtzOpn5kgv9oFjubbVL9zvGsH1Duheqz5sjPZDbRoblO4bRanKFOaCfgN6a4Bj</recordid><startdate>19490401</startdate><enddate>19490401</enddate><creator>Locke, Bernard</creator><creator>Grimm, Charles H</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><general>American Psychological Association, etc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19490401</creationdate><title>Odor selection, preferences and identification</title><author>Locke, Bernard ; Grimm, Charles H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a365t-8008c6290f8f740fd2c8a2887566851a7532e714df1aa8305befd79a3c8b5f3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1949</creationdate><topic>Commerce</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Odor Discrimination</topic><topic>Odorants</topic><topic>Old Medline</topic><topic>Olfactory Perception</topic><topic>Olfactory Stimulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Locke, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimm, Charles H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Locke, Bernard</au><au>Grimm, Charles H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Odor selection, preferences and identification</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><date>1949-04-01</date><risdate>1949</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>167</spage><epage>174</epage><pages>167-174</pages><issn>0021-9010</issn><eissn>1939-1854</eissn><abstract>69 college women were given samples of 8 perfumes and indicated whether they thought the perfume to be expensive or inexpensive and the odor to be pleasant or unpleasant. The mean percentage of correct estimations of perfume value was 55 (50% being chance identification) and the floral odor was identified with 23.5% accuracy. There was a tendency to select expensive perfumes as being inexpensive and to attribute unpleasantness to odors thought to be costly.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>18114577</pmid><doi>10.1037/h0062514</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-9010 |
| ispartof | Journal of applied psychology, 1949-04, Vol.33 (2), p.167-174 |
| issn | 0021-9010 1939-1854 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_74585321 |
| source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Commerce Female Human Humans Odor Discrimination Odorants Old Medline Olfactory Perception Olfactory Stimulation |
| title | Odor selection, preferences and identification |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T06%3A57%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Odor%20selection,%20preferences%20and%20identification&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20psychology&rft.au=Locke,%20Bernard&rft.date=1949-04-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=167&rft.epage=174&rft.pages=167-174&rft.issn=0021-9010&rft.eissn=1939-1854&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0062514&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614245373%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614245373&rft_id=info:pmid/18114577&rfr_iscdi=true |