Determination of crack resistance curves under static and dynamic loading by analysis of load displacement relationship
The key curve method according to Ernst et al. ( Fracture Mechanics, ASTM STP 677, pp. 581–599, 1979) was applied for the determination of J R -curves. Steels with different yield strength and toughness were investigated. The method requires a calibration curve, which has to be determined for each m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Engineering fracture mechanics 1989, Vol.34 (4), p.989-1000 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The key curve method according to Ernst
et al. (
Fracture Mechanics, ASTM STP
677, pp. 581–599, 1979) was applied for the determination of
J
R
-curves. Steels with different yield strength and toughness were investigated. The method requires a calibration curve, which has to be determined for each material and specimen type. It was shown for CT-specimens that crack extensions calculated by the key curve method are in good agreement with those observed on the fracture surfaces. The
J
1-values determined coincided well with values derived from ‘stretched-zone’ measurements and the equation for the ‘blunting-line’ according to Shih (
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
29, 305–326,1981). It was demonstrated that the key curve method can be applied even at high loading rates. 1 CT-25-specimens were tested at ram speeds up to 4
m
s
. First results of instrumented charpy impact tests showed that crack propagation can be monitored in charpy V-notch specimens, too. On the other hand, crack initiation is difficult to detect in the latter case because of superimposed oscillations in the load signal. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0013-7944 1873-7315 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0013-7944(89)90233-6 |