Differential expression of protease‐activated receptors in monocytes from patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome

Objective To investigate the expression of protease‐activated receptors (PARs), their potential regulation by anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), and their association with the expression of other molecules relevant to thrombosis in monocytes obtained from 62 patients with primary antiphospholipid syn...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthritis and rheumatism 2010-03, Vol.62 (3), p.869-877
Hauptverfasser: López‐Pedrera, Chary, Aguirre, Maria Ángeles, Buendía, Paula, Barbarroja, Nuria, Ruiz‐Limón, Patricia, Collantes‐Estevez, Eduardo, Velasco, Francisco, Khamashta, Munther, Cuadrado, Maria José
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To investigate the expression of protease‐activated receptors (PARs), their potential regulation by anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), and their association with the expression of other molecules relevant to thrombosis in monocytes obtained from 62 patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Methods Monocytes were isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells by magnetic depletion of nonmonocytes. Expression of tissue factor (TF) and PARs 1–4 genes was measured by quantitative real‐time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction. Cell surface TF and PARs 1–4 expression was analyzed by flow cytometry. For in vitro studies, purified normal monocytes were incubated with purified APS patient IgG, normal human serum IgG, or lipopolysaccharide, in the presence or absence of specific monoclonal antibodies anti–PAR‐1 (ATAP2) or anti–PAR‐2 (SAM11) to test the effect of blocking the active site of PAR‐1 or PAR‐2. Results Analysis of both mRNA and protein for the 4 PARs revealed significantly increased expression of PAR‐2 as compared with the control groups. PAR‐1 was significantly overexpressed in APS patients with thrombosis and in the control patients with thrombosis but without APS. PAR‐3 expression was not significantly altered. PAR‐4 expression was absent in all groups analyzed. In addition, we demonstrated a correlation between the levels of PAR‐2 and the titers of IgG aCL, as well as parallel behavior of TF and PAR‐2 expression. In vitro, IgG from APS patients significantly increased monocyte expression of PAR‐1 and PAR‐2. Inhibition studies suggested that there was direct cross‐talk between TF and PAR‐2, such that inhibition of PAR‐2 prevented the aCL‐induced expression of TF. Conclusion These results provide the first demonstration of increased expression of PARs in monocytes from patients with APS. Thus, PAR antagonists might have therapeutic potential as antithrombotic agents in APS.
ISSN:0004-3591
1529-0131
DOI:10.1002/art.27299