Circular dichroic analysis of protein conformation: Inclusion of the β-turns
The mean residue ellipticity, [θ], at any wavelength, λ, of a protein in aqueous solution is expressed as [θ] λ = f H [θ] H x (1 − k n ) + f β[θ] β + f t [θ] t + f R [θ] R with two constraints: 1 ≥ f j ≥ 0 and Σf j = 1. The subscripts H, β, t, and R refer to the helix, β-form, β-turn, and unordered...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Analytical biochemistry 1978-11, Vol.91 (1), p.13-31 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The mean residue ellipticity, [θ], at any wavelength, λ, of a protein in aqueous solution is expressed as
[θ]
λ = f
H
[θ]
H
x
(1 −
k
n
) + f
β[θ]
β + f
t
[θ]
t
+ f
R
[θ]
R
with two constraints: 1 ≥
f
j
≥ 0 and
Σf
j
= 1. The subscripts H, β, t, and R refer to the helix, β-form, β-turn, and unordered form. The fractions,
f
j
′s, of 15 proteins are based on X-ray crystallography,
f
t refers to the net β-turn after cancelling those residues having dihedral angles of opposite sign. The [
θ]
H
x of an infinite helix and its chain-length dependence factor,
k, were computed from the myoglobin data (Chen
et al., 1974,
Biochemistry,
13, 3350). The average number of residues per helical segment,
n
, for 15 proteins was about 10, which can be used for proteins of unknown structure. The reference spectra of other three structural elements are computed by a least-squares method. Once the reference spectra are chosen, the same equation above can be used to estimate the fractions of the secondary structure of a portein from its CD data points between 190 and 240 nm at 1-nm intervals. The computed helical content is usually good to excellent (concanavalin A is a notable exception). Inclusion of the β-turn in the analysis improves the correlation for the estimates of the β-form, but the computed
β
t values are not significantly correlated with the X-ray results. Matrix formulation proves the equivalence of the least-squares method and the integral curve-fitting. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-2697 1096-0309 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0003-2697(78)90812-6 |