Spatial heterogeneity of soil organic carbon in tree-based intercropping systems in Quebec and Ontario, Canada

Land use affects the carbon sequestration potential of soils across landscapes. Tree-based intercropping (TBI) systems where annual crops are grown between established tree rows are expected to exhibit spatial heterogeneity in the soil organic carbon (SOC) content due to differences in carbon input...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agroforestry systems 2010-07, Vol.79 (3), p.343-353
Hauptverfasser: Bambrick, Amanda D, Whalen, Joann K, Bradley, Robert L, Cogliastro, Alain, Gordon, Andrew M, Olivier, Alain, Thevathasan, Naresh V
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 353
container_issue 3
container_start_page 343
container_title Agroforestry systems
container_volume 79
creator Bambrick, Amanda D
Whalen, Joann K
Bradley, Robert L
Cogliastro, Alain
Gordon, Andrew M
Olivier, Alain
Thevathasan, Naresh V
description Land use affects the carbon sequestration potential of soils across landscapes. Tree-based intercropping (TBI) systems where annual crops are grown between established tree rows are expected to exhibit spatial heterogeneity in the soil organic carbon (SOC) content due to differences in carbon input and decomposition rates of litter from trees and herbaceous plants. This study aimed to quantify variability in the SOC of TBI systems, compare the SOC content of TBI and nearby conventional agroecosystems, and determine if SOC was related to soil fertility. The TBI research sites were established 4 years (St. Paulin and St. Edouard, Quebec, Canada), 8 years (St. Remi, Quebec, Canada) and 21 years (Guelph, Ontario, Canada) before soil samples were collected for this study. The SOC content was greater within 0.75 m of the tree row than in the intercropped space at the St. Edouard and St. Remi sites. At the Guelph site, the SOC was spatially heterogeneous in plots with Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) but not hybrid poplar (Populus deltoides × P. nigra clone DN-177), probably due to litterfall distribution. Formerly a tree plantation, the TBI system at St. Remi contained 77% more SOC than a nearby conventional agroecosystem, while there was 12% more SOC in the TBI system than the conventional agroecosystem at Guelph. There was no difference in the SOC content of 4-year old TBI sites and nearby conventional agroecosystems. However, an increase in SOC at all TBI sites was positively related to the plant-available N concentrations, indicating the benefit of temperate TBI systems for soil fertility.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10457-010-9305-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744623379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>744623379</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-6558a17d0a44dda280843ce1c61fe1eb456a3c622a5af32f5eb6190172562ef73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE2L1EAQhoMoOK7-AE82gnjZaPV3cpRBXWFhkXXPTaVTiVky3bE7c5j99faQRcGDp6Kp532ofqvqNYcPHMB-zByUtjVwqFsJun54Uu24tqJuTQNPqx1wY2sljXlevcj5HgBaY5tdFW4XXCec2U9aKcWRAk3ricWB5TjNLKYRw-SZx9TFwKbA1kRUd5ipL68S8SkuyxRGlk95pUM-M9-P1JFnGHp2E1ZMU7xkewzY48vq2YBzpleP86K6-_L5x_6qvr75-m3_6br2CvhaG60b5LYHVKrvUTTQKOmJe8MH4tQpbVB6IwRqHKQYNHWGt8Ct0EbQYOVF9X7zLin-OlJe3WHKnuYZA8VjdlYpI6S0bSHf_kPex2MK5TingReflU2B-AaV3-acaHBLmg6YTo6DO_fvtv5d6d-d-3cPJfPuUYzZ4zwkDH7Kf4JCtMpYdXaLjctlFUZKfw_4n_zNFhowOhxTEd_dCuASeKNNa6T8DTIBnwk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>501256738</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatial heterogeneity of soil organic carbon in tree-based intercropping systems in Quebec and Ontario, Canada</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Bambrick, Amanda D ; Whalen, Joann K ; Bradley, Robert L ; Cogliastro, Alain ; Gordon, Andrew M ; Olivier, Alain ; Thevathasan, Naresh V</creator><creatorcontrib>Bambrick, Amanda D ; Whalen, Joann K ; Bradley, Robert L ; Cogliastro, Alain ; Gordon, Andrew M ; Olivier, Alain ; Thevathasan, Naresh V</creatorcontrib><description>Land use affects the carbon sequestration potential of soils across landscapes. Tree-based intercropping (TBI) systems where annual crops are grown between established tree rows are expected to exhibit spatial heterogeneity in the soil organic carbon (SOC) content due to differences in carbon input and decomposition rates of litter from trees and herbaceous plants. This study aimed to quantify variability in the SOC of TBI systems, compare the SOC content of TBI and nearby conventional agroecosystems, and determine if SOC was related to soil fertility. The TBI research sites were established 4 years (St. Paulin and St. Edouard, Quebec, Canada), 8 years (St. Remi, Quebec, Canada) and 21 years (Guelph, Ontario, Canada) before soil samples were collected for this study. The SOC content was greater within 0.75 m of the tree row than in the intercropped space at the St. Edouard and St. Remi sites. At the Guelph site, the SOC was spatially heterogeneous in plots with Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) but not hybrid poplar (Populus deltoides × P. nigra clone DN-177), probably due to litterfall distribution. Formerly a tree plantation, the TBI system at St. Remi contained 77% more SOC than a nearby conventional agroecosystem, while there was 12% more SOC in the TBI system than the conventional agroecosystem at Guelph. There was no difference in the SOC content of 4-year old TBI sites and nearby conventional agroecosystems. However, an increase in SOC at all TBI sites was positively related to the plant-available N concentrations, indicating the benefit of temperate TBI systems for soil fertility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-4366</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9680</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10457-010-9305-z</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGSYE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agricultural ecosystems ; Agricultural practices ; Agriculture ; agroecosystems ; agroforestry ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; annuals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Carbon sequestration ; crops ; forest litter ; forest plantations ; Forest soils ; forest trees ; Forestry ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Heterogeneity ; Intercropping ; Land use ; land use change ; Life Sciences ; nitrogen ; nutrient availability ; Organic carbon ; Picea abies ; Pine trees ; Populus ; Soil fertility ; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility ; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments ; Soils ; spatial distribution ; spatial variation ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Agroforestry systems, 2010-07, Vol.79 (3), p.343-353</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-6558a17d0a44dda280843ce1c61fe1eb456a3c622a5af32f5eb6190172562ef73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-6558a17d0a44dda280843ce1c61fe1eb456a3c622a5af32f5eb6190172562ef73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10457-010-9305-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10457-010-9305-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22946748$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bambrick, Amanda D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whalen, Joann K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cogliastro, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Andrew M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olivier, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thevathasan, Naresh V</creatorcontrib><title>Spatial heterogeneity of soil organic carbon in tree-based intercropping systems in Quebec and Ontario, Canada</title><title>Agroforestry systems</title><addtitle>Agroforest Syst</addtitle><description>Land use affects the carbon sequestration potential of soils across landscapes. Tree-based intercropping (TBI) systems where annual crops are grown between established tree rows are expected to exhibit spatial heterogeneity in the soil organic carbon (SOC) content due to differences in carbon input and decomposition rates of litter from trees and herbaceous plants. This study aimed to quantify variability in the SOC of TBI systems, compare the SOC content of TBI and nearby conventional agroecosystems, and determine if SOC was related to soil fertility. The TBI research sites were established 4 years (St. Paulin and St. Edouard, Quebec, Canada), 8 years (St. Remi, Quebec, Canada) and 21 years (Guelph, Ontario, Canada) before soil samples were collected for this study. The SOC content was greater within 0.75 m of the tree row than in the intercropped space at the St. Edouard and St. Remi sites. At the Guelph site, the SOC was spatially heterogeneous in plots with Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) but not hybrid poplar (Populus deltoides × P. nigra clone DN-177), probably due to litterfall distribution. Formerly a tree plantation, the TBI system at St. Remi contained 77% more SOC than a nearby conventional agroecosystem, while there was 12% more SOC in the TBI system than the conventional agroecosystem at Guelph. There was no difference in the SOC content of 4-year old TBI sites and nearby conventional agroecosystems. However, an increase in SOC at all TBI sites was positively related to the plant-available N concentrations, indicating the benefit of temperate TBI systems for soil fertility.</description><subject>Agricultural ecosystems</subject><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>agroecosystems</subject><subject>agroforestry</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>annuals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>crops</subject><subject>forest litter</subject><subject>forest plantations</subject><subject>Forest soils</subject><subject>forest trees</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Intercropping</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>land use change</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>nitrogen</subject><subject>nutrient availability</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Picea abies</subject><subject>Pine trees</subject><subject>Populus</subject><subject>Soil fertility</subject><subject>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility</subject><subject>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>spatial distribution</subject><subject>spatial variation</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0167-4366</issn><issn>1572-9680</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE2L1EAQhoMoOK7-AE82gnjZaPV3cpRBXWFhkXXPTaVTiVky3bE7c5j99faQRcGDp6Kp532ofqvqNYcPHMB-zByUtjVwqFsJun54Uu24tqJuTQNPqx1wY2sljXlevcj5HgBaY5tdFW4XXCec2U9aKcWRAk3ricWB5TjNLKYRw-SZx9TFwKbA1kRUd5ipL68S8SkuyxRGlk95pUM-M9-P1JFnGHp2E1ZMU7xkewzY48vq2YBzpleP86K6-_L5x_6qvr75-m3_6br2CvhaG60b5LYHVKrvUTTQKOmJe8MH4tQpbVB6IwRqHKQYNHWGt8Ct0EbQYOVF9X7zLin-OlJe3WHKnuYZA8VjdlYpI6S0bSHf_kPex2MK5TingReflU2B-AaV3-acaHBLmg6YTo6DO_fvtv5d6d-d-3cPJfPuUYzZ4zwkDH7Kf4JCtMpYdXaLjctlFUZKfw_4n_zNFhowOhxTEd_dCuASeKNNa6T8DTIBnwk</recordid><startdate>20100701</startdate><enddate>20100701</enddate><creator>Bambrick, Amanda D</creator><creator>Whalen, Joann K</creator><creator>Bradley, Robert L</creator><creator>Cogliastro, Alain</creator><creator>Gordon, Andrew M</creator><creator>Olivier, Alain</creator><creator>Thevathasan, Naresh V</creator><general>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100701</creationdate><title>Spatial heterogeneity of soil organic carbon in tree-based intercropping systems in Quebec and Ontario, Canada</title><author>Bambrick, Amanda D ; Whalen, Joann K ; Bradley, Robert L ; Cogliastro, Alain ; Gordon, Andrew M ; Olivier, Alain ; Thevathasan, Naresh V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-6558a17d0a44dda280843ce1c61fe1eb456a3c622a5af32f5eb6190172562ef73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Agricultural ecosystems</topic><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>agroecosystems</topic><topic>agroforestry</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>annuals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>crops</topic><topic>forest litter</topic><topic>forest plantations</topic><topic>Forest soils</topic><topic>forest trees</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Intercropping</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>land use change</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>nitrogen</topic><topic>nutrient availability</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Picea abies</topic><topic>Pine trees</topic><topic>Populus</topic><topic>Soil fertility</topic><topic>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility</topic><topic>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>spatial distribution</topic><topic>spatial variation</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bambrick, Amanda D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whalen, Joann K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cogliastro, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Andrew M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olivier, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thevathasan, Naresh V</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agroforestry systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bambrick, Amanda D</au><au>Whalen, Joann K</au><au>Bradley, Robert L</au><au>Cogliastro, Alain</au><au>Gordon, Andrew M</au><au>Olivier, Alain</au><au>Thevathasan, Naresh V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatial heterogeneity of soil organic carbon in tree-based intercropping systems in Quebec and Ontario, Canada</atitle><jtitle>Agroforestry systems</jtitle><stitle>Agroforest Syst</stitle><date>2010-07-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>343</spage><epage>353</epage><pages>343-353</pages><issn>0167-4366</issn><eissn>1572-9680</eissn><coden>AGSYE6</coden><abstract>Land use affects the carbon sequestration potential of soils across landscapes. Tree-based intercropping (TBI) systems where annual crops are grown between established tree rows are expected to exhibit spatial heterogeneity in the soil organic carbon (SOC) content due to differences in carbon input and decomposition rates of litter from trees and herbaceous plants. This study aimed to quantify variability in the SOC of TBI systems, compare the SOC content of TBI and nearby conventional agroecosystems, and determine if SOC was related to soil fertility. The TBI research sites were established 4 years (St. Paulin and St. Edouard, Quebec, Canada), 8 years (St. Remi, Quebec, Canada) and 21 years (Guelph, Ontario, Canada) before soil samples were collected for this study. The SOC content was greater within 0.75 m of the tree row than in the intercropped space at the St. Edouard and St. Remi sites. At the Guelph site, the SOC was spatially heterogeneous in plots with Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) but not hybrid poplar (Populus deltoides × P. nigra clone DN-177), probably due to litterfall distribution. Formerly a tree plantation, the TBI system at St. Remi contained 77% more SOC than a nearby conventional agroecosystem, while there was 12% more SOC in the TBI system than the conventional agroecosystem at Guelph. There was no difference in the SOC content of 4-year old TBI sites and nearby conventional agroecosystems. However, an increase in SOC at all TBI sites was positively related to the plant-available N concentrations, indicating the benefit of temperate TBI systems for soil fertility.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10457-010-9305-z</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-4366
ispartof Agroforestry systems, 2010-07, Vol.79 (3), p.343-353
issn 0167-4366
1572-9680
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744623379
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Agricultural ecosystems
Agricultural practices
Agriculture
agroecosystems
agroforestry
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
annuals
Biological and medical sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Carbon sequestration
crops
forest litter
forest plantations
Forest soils
forest trees
Forestry
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agronomy. Plant production
Heterogeneity
Intercropping
Land use
land use change
Life Sciences
nitrogen
nutrient availability
Organic carbon
Picea abies
Pine trees
Populus
Soil fertility
Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility
Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments
Soils
spatial distribution
spatial variation
Trees
title Spatial heterogeneity of soil organic carbon in tree-based intercropping systems in Quebec and Ontario, Canada
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T12%3A48%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatial%20heterogeneity%20of%20soil%20organic%20carbon%20in%20tree-based%20intercropping%20systems%20in%20Quebec%20and%20Ontario,%20Canada&rft.jtitle=Agroforestry%20systems&rft.au=Bambrick,%20Amanda%20D&rft.date=2010-07-01&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=353&rft.pages=343-353&rft.issn=0167-4366&rft.eissn=1572-9680&rft.coden=AGSYE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10457-010-9305-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E744623379%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=501256738&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true