Why don't foreign firms cooperate in US antidumping investigations? An empirical analysis

Foreign firms face punitive duties if they do not cooperate with the US Department of Commerce (DOC) in antidumping procedures. For example, 37% of all foreign firms involved in antidumping investigations in the US faced "facts available" margins for the 1995-2002 period, with average antidumping duties of 31 % for cooperating foreign firms, compared to 87% for those who did not cooperate.The existing literature has focused on how DOC discretion has led to foreign firm noncooperation.This paper instead examines individual foreign firm's decisions about whether to cooperate during this same period. We find evidence that non-cooperation is consistent with a model of foreign firms rationally choosing not to cooperate, rather than solely as a result of investigating authority bias against imports.