Are two document clusters better than one? The Cluster Performance Question for information retrieval

When do information retrieval systems using two document clusters provide better retrieval performance than systems using no clustering? We answer this question for one set of assumptions and suggest how this may be studied with other assumptions. The “Cluster Hypothesis” asks an empirical question...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2005-01, Vol.56 (1), p.106-108
Hauptverfasser: Losee, Robert M., Church, Jr, Lewis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:When do information retrieval systems using two document clusters provide better retrieval performance than systems using no clustering? We answer this question for one set of assumptions and suggest how this may be studied with other assumptions. The “Cluster Hypothesis” asks an empirical question about the relationships between documents and user‐supplied relevance judgments, while the “Cluster Performance Question” proposed here focuses on the when and why of information retrieval or digital library performance for clustered and unclustered text databases. This may be generalized to study the relative performance of m versus n clusters.
ISSN:1532-2882
2330-1635
1532-2890
2330-1643
DOI:10.1002/asi.20068