Relationships between Soil–Landscape and Dryland Cotton Lint Yield

Topographical land features shape the spatial variability of soils and crop yields, especially in dryland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). The objectives of this study were to (i) quantify the relationships between cotton lint yields vs. derived topographical attributes in combination with measured s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Soil Science Society of America journal 2005-05, Vol.69 (3), p.872-882
Hauptverfasser: Iqbal, Javed, Read, John J., Thomasson, Alex J., Jenkins, Johnie N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Topographical land features shape the spatial variability of soils and crop yields, especially in dryland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). The objectives of this study were to (i) quantify the relationships between cotton lint yields vs. derived topographical attributes in combination with measured soil physical properties, and (ii) quantify the relationships between measured soil physical properties and derived topographical attributes. The dominant soil of the study area was classified as Vaiden soil series (very‐fine, smectitic, thermic Aquic Dystruderts). More than 4500 elevation point data were recorded in a 42‐ha field using a real‐time kinematic‐global positioning system (RTK‐GPS) used in a geographic information system (GIS) to derive topographic (slope, curvature and aspect) and hydrologic attributes (wetness index, flow direction, flow length, flow accumulation, and sediment transport index). Surface (0–17 cm) sand, clay, saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks), bulk density (ρb), water content at seven equilibrium pressure levels ranging from −0.01 to −1.5 MPa, and 2‐yr cotton lint yield data were measured from sites selected based on classified normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). Stepwise linear regression indicated that cotton lint yield variability was explained by soil properties (65% in 2001 and 58% in 2002), and topographic and hydrologic attributes (40 and 21%), as well as their combined effects (82 and 72%). Elevation, flow direction, sediment transport index, percentage sand content, and volumetric water content (θv) at −0.001 MPa pressure explained most of the lint yield variation. Overall, statistical analysis indicated that higher elevation areas generally yielded lower (r = −0.50, P < 0.01) and may experience water stress earlier in the season, as compared with lower elevation areas. We expect that once these features are derived and interpreted, they will have a long‐lasting impact on cotton management under dryland conditions.
ISSN:0361-5995
1435-0661
DOI:10.2136/sssaj2004.0178