Nitrogen and Water Stress Interact to Influence Carbon‐13 Discrimination in Wheat

The impact of interactions between water and N stress on 13C isotopic discrimination (Δ) is not well understood. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of N on Δ in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown under low, moderate, and high water stress. In a field study located near Havre, Mo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Soil Science Society of America journal 2001-11, Vol.65 (6), p.1823-1828
Hauptverfasser: Clay, D. E., Engel, R. E., Long, D. S., Liu, Z.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The impact of interactions between water and N stress on 13C isotopic discrimination (Δ) is not well understood. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of N on Δ in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown under low, moderate, and high water stress. In a field study located near Havre, Montana, USA (48° 30′ N lat. and 109° 22′ W long.), wheat grown under three different water stress environments (low, moderate, and high) was fertilized with three different N rates (none, moderate, and high). Each treatment was replicated four times. The grain N fertilizer use efficiency increased as water stress decreased. A differential response of Δ to N was observed. In general, if plants were grown under high water stress and N increased yield, then adding N to N‐deficient plants reduced Δ (−0.01‰ for every kg of N added); and if plants were grown under low water stress and N increased yield, then adding N had little or no impact on Δ. The break point between N impacting or not impacting Δ was ∼17.45‰. Under non‐N limiting (moderate and high N) conditions the equation relating Δ to yield was, yield (kg ha−1) = −11000 + 884 Δ, r = 0.92**. Wheat grown under N‐deficient conditions (0N treatment) did not fit this curve. By accounting for the impact of water and N stress on Δ, this variation could be explained. Results from this study suggest that Δ can be used to characterize N and water stress at different landscape positions in watershed studies.
ISSN:0361-5995
1435-0661
DOI:10.2136/sssaj2001.1823