Magnetic Susceptibility for Use in Delineating Hydric Soils

Field indicators are used to identify hydric soil boundaries and to delineate wetlands. The most common field indicators may not be seen in some soils with thick, dark, mollic epipedons, and do not form in Fe‐poor soils. This study evaluated magnetic susceptibility (MS) meter as a field tool to dete...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Soil Science Society of America journal 2000-11, Vol.64 (6), p.2174-2180
Hauptverfasser: Grimley, D. A., Vepraskas, M. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Field indicators are used to identify hydric soil boundaries and to delineate wetlands. The most common field indicators may not be seen in some soils with thick, dark, mollic epipedons, and do not form in Fe‐poor soils. This study evaluated magnetic susceptibility (MS) meter as a field tool to determine hydric soil boundaries. Five Mollisol‐dominated sites formed in glacial deposits in Illinois were evaluated along with one Ultisol‐dominated site formed in Coastal Plain sediments of North Carolina. Measurements of volumetric MS were made along transects at each site that extended from wetland into upland areas. One created wetland was evaluated. Field indicators were used to identify the hydric soils. Results showed that volumetric MS values were significantly (P < 0.01) lower in hydric soils than in nonhydric soils formed in glacial deposits. Volumetric MS values also decreased slightly with depth. In a created marsh, significant differences in MS were found between hydric and nonhydric soils at 15 to 30 cm but not at shallower depths where topsoil from a wetland had been artificially applied. No significant (P > 0.15) differences in MS were found for Coastal Plain hydric and nonhydric soils where MS values were low (
ISSN:0361-5995
1435-0661
DOI:10.2136/sssaj2000.6462174x