Biomechanical comparison of three second-generation reconstruction nails in an unstable subtrochanteric femur fracture model

Abstract The purpose of this study is to determine if a biomechanical difference exists in dynamic stiffness, fatigue life, and fracture site displacement by comparing three cephalomedullary reconstruction nails. An examination was made of the Biomet Uniflex reconstruction nail, the Biomet Vector nail, and the Stryker Howmedica Long Gamma nail in the fixation of an unstable subtrochanteric femur fracture model, using a synthetic bone model. Mean stiffness for each nail was initially determined in control specimens (i.e. no fracture and no instrumentation). The nail stiffness values were 1764.0 N/mm (controls), 373.61 N/mm (Uniflex), 294.27 N/mm (vector), and 656.36 N/mm (Gamma). The Gamma was statistically stiffer than the Uniflex and Vector (p