Short-term civil commitment and the violent patient
To explore the specificity of criteria for civil commitment for dangerousness, the authors examined the relationship between civil commitment for dangerousness to others under the California Civil Commitment Statute (the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act) and violent acts and behavioral ratings made immedi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of psychiatry 1982-09, Vol.139 (9), p.1145-1149 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To explore the specificity of criteria for civil commitment for
dangerousness, the authors examined the relationship between civil
commitment for dangerousness to others under the California Civil
Commitment Statute (the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act) and violent acts and
behavioral ratings made immediately after commitment. Using a prospective
design they evaluated 84 subjects. The ratings of violent acts for subjects
considered dangerous to others were no different than those of a
nondangerous control group. The subjects considered dangerous to others,
however, differed on several subscales of the Brief Psychiatric Rating
Scale. The authors discuss the implications of these results for civil
commitment proceedings. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-953X 1535-7228 |
DOI: | 10.1176/ajp.139.9.1145 |