Skills and procedures in emergency medicine: Room for controversy
To examine patterns of consensus and divergence of opinion about whether, and under what conditions, residency-trained emergency physicians use certain skills and perform procedures, directors of 35 emergency medicine, 28 surgery and 30 internal medicine residency programs were surveyed. The directo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians 1978-05, Vol.7 (5), p.198-201 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To examine patterns of consensus and divergence of opinion about whether, and under what conditions, residency-trained emergency physicians use certain skills and perform procedures, directors of 35 emergency medicine, 28 surgery and 30 internal medicine residency programs were surveyed. The directors reacted to a list of 30 skills modified from the condition/skills list compiled by the Certification Task Force of the American College of Emergency Physicians representing a consensus on the core-knowledge for emergency medicine, as determined by both practicing and university-based emergency physicians. The responses indicate a wide variation of opinion about which skills are within the realm of residency-trained emergency physicians, and under what circumstances a procedure should be performed. The skills of greatest concern among emergency medicine directors include axillary and intravenous lidocaine blocks, bronchoscopy, burr holes, closed reduction of dislocated hips, Swan-Ganz catheterization, and cardiopulmonary by-pass. In contrast, slightly more than one third of the procedures on the modified list were clearly agreed upon by over 80% of the directors as procedures performed by trained emergency physicians. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0361-1124 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0361-1124(78)80099-9 |