The results of revision carpal tunnel release following previous open versus endoscopic surgery

This study compared the outcomes of revision open carpal tunnel release following previous open versus endoscopic release to determine whether revision surgery has different results based on the type of initial surgical treatment. Thirty revision carpal tunnel releases were performed in 13 wrists th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.) 1998-09, Vol.23 (5), p.865-869
Hauptverfasser: Hulsizer, Dina L., Staebler, Michael P., Weiss, Arnold-Peter C., Akelman, Edward
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study compared the outcomes of revision open carpal tunnel release following previous open versus endoscopic release to determine whether revision surgery has different results based on the type of initial surgical treatment. Thirty revision carpal tunnel releases were performed in 13 wrists that had previous endoscopic release and in 17 wrists with prior open release. At a follow-up visit an average of 30 months after surgery, self-assessment questionnaires demonstrated improved or complete symptom relief in 77% of the postendoscopic release group versus 47% in the previous open release group. Combining both groups, 18% of workers' compensation patients improved after revision surgery compared with 84% of those with conventional insurance (p
ISSN:0363-5023
1531-6564
DOI:10.1016/S0363-5023(98)80164-0