Improved internal defibrillation success with shocks timed to the morphology electrogram

A previous retrospective study by our group suggested that shocks timed to the upslope of the shocking lead electrogram improved defibrillation efficacy. The goal of this study was to prospectively determine whether defibrillation threshold could be reduced by use of an algorithm that timed shocks t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 1998-08, Vol.98 (8), p.808-812
Hauptverfasser: HSU, W, YAYUN LIN, LANG, D. J, JONES, J. L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 812
container_issue 8
container_start_page 808
container_title Circulation (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 98
creator HSU, W
YAYUN LIN
LANG, D. J
JONES, J. L
description A previous retrospective study by our group suggested that shocks timed to the upslope of the shocking lead electrogram improved defibrillation efficacy. The goal of this study was to prospectively determine whether defibrillation threshold could be reduced by use of an algorithm that timed shocks to the upslope of coarse ventricular fibrillation (test treatment) compared with shocks delivered asynchronously after 10 seconds of fibrillation (control treatment). Ten pigs were instrumented with a 3-lead system for internal defibrillation. Initial estimates of the energy required to achieve defibrillation E50 for both treatments were made by an up/down method. Subsequently, additional shocks at V50+/-10% and V50-20% were given for each treatment to obtain data points at higher and lower intensities. Probability-of-success curves were estimated for both treatments by the best-fit method. Energies required were significantly lower for the timed shocks than for the asynchronous shocks (P
doi_str_mv 10.1161/01.CIR.98.8.808
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73924189</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>33416977</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-4328807d1a0446cfb8e7f7d72363e817ed206c102b8fbbeeafd3f0adb8aeecfc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkM1rGzEQxUVocN0055wKopTe1tHH7ko6FtMkhkAhpNCb0GpHtpLdlStpG_zfVyHGhzCHYZjfe8w8hK4oWVHa0mtCV-vNw0rJVSkiz9CSNqyu6oarD2hJCFGV4Ix9RJ9Seipjy0WzQAslmGgatkR_NuM-hn_QYz9liJMZcA_Od9EPg8k-TDjN1kJK-MXnHU67YJ8Tzn4sihxw3gEeQ9zvwhC2BwwD2BzDNprxMzp3ZkhweewX6PfNz8f1XXX_63az_nFf2ZqpXNWcSUlETw2p69a6ToJwoheMtxwkFdAz0lpKWCdd1wEY13NHTN9JA2Cd5Rfo-5tveePvDCnr0ScL5foJwpy04IrVVKoCfn0HPoX59eGkGWWCScp5ga7fIBtDShGc3kc_mnjQlOjXwDWhugSuldSliCyKL0fbuSuhnPhjwmX_7bg3yZrBRTNZn04Y441QkvD_xoyKSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212728133</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improved internal defibrillation success with shocks timed to the morphology electrogram</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Heart Association Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>HSU, W ; YAYUN LIN ; LANG, D. J ; JONES, J. L</creator><creatorcontrib>HSU, W ; YAYUN LIN ; LANG, D. J ; JONES, J. L</creatorcontrib><description>A previous retrospective study by our group suggested that shocks timed to the upslope of the shocking lead electrogram improved defibrillation efficacy. The goal of this study was to prospectively determine whether defibrillation threshold could be reduced by use of an algorithm that timed shocks to the upslope of coarse ventricular fibrillation (test treatment) compared with shocks delivered asynchronously after 10 seconds of fibrillation (control treatment). Ten pigs were instrumented with a 3-lead system for internal defibrillation. Initial estimates of the energy required to achieve defibrillation E50 for both treatments were made by an up/down method. Subsequently, additional shocks at V50+/-10% and V50-20% were given for each treatment to obtain data points at higher and lower intensities. Probability-of-success curves were estimated for both treatments by the best-fit method. Energies required were significantly lower for the timed shocks than for the asynchronous shocks (P&lt;0.00 1). E80 was reduced 15.5%, from 27.1+/-2.5 to 22.9+/-1.8 J (P&lt;0.002). The width of the probability-of-success curve (E80-E20) for the test treatment was also significantly narrower than that for the control treatment (7.1+/-0.9 versus 10.8+/-1.7, P&lt;0.01). Normalized curve width (E80-E20)/E50 was decreased from 51+/-5% of E50 for control shocks to 37+/-4% of E50 for synchronous shocks (P&lt;0.02). In this model, defibrillation threshold is lower and more deterministic when shocks are timed to the upslope of the shocking lead electrogram. If a similar reduction is observed in humans, shock timing may lower defibrillation threshold and simplify programming of shock intensity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-7322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.98.8.808</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9727552</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CIRCAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiac dysrhythmias ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Electric Countershock ; Electrocardiography ; Electrodes ; Heart ; Medical sciences ; Probability ; Prospective Studies ; Swine ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 1998-08, Vol.98 (8), p.808-812</ispartof><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Heart Association, Inc. Aug 25, 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-4328807d1a0446cfb8e7f7d72363e817ed206c102b8fbbeeafd3f0adb8aeecfc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-4328807d1a0446cfb8e7f7d72363e817ed206c102b8fbbeeafd3f0adb8aeecfc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3689,27931,27932</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2357980$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9727552$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HSU, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YAYUN LIN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LANG, D. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JONES, J. L</creatorcontrib><title>Improved internal defibrillation success with shocks timed to the morphology electrogram</title><title>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><description>A previous retrospective study by our group suggested that shocks timed to the upslope of the shocking lead electrogram improved defibrillation efficacy. The goal of this study was to prospectively determine whether defibrillation threshold could be reduced by use of an algorithm that timed shocks to the upslope of coarse ventricular fibrillation (test treatment) compared with shocks delivered asynchronously after 10 seconds of fibrillation (control treatment). Ten pigs were instrumented with a 3-lead system for internal defibrillation. Initial estimates of the energy required to achieve defibrillation E50 for both treatments were made by an up/down method. Subsequently, additional shocks at V50+/-10% and V50-20% were given for each treatment to obtain data points at higher and lower intensities. Probability-of-success curves were estimated for both treatments by the best-fit method. Energies required were significantly lower for the timed shocks than for the asynchronous shocks (P&lt;0.00 1). E80 was reduced 15.5%, from 27.1+/-2.5 to 22.9+/-1.8 J (P&lt;0.002). The width of the probability-of-success curve (E80-E20) for the test treatment was also significantly narrower than that for the control treatment (7.1+/-0.9 versus 10.8+/-1.7, P&lt;0.01). Normalized curve width (E80-E20)/E50 was decreased from 51+/-5% of E50 for control shocks to 37+/-4% of E50 for synchronous shocks (P&lt;0.02). In this model, defibrillation threshold is lower and more deterministic when shocks are timed to the upslope of the shocking lead electrogram. If a similar reduction is observed in humans, shock timing may lower defibrillation threshold and simplify programming of shock intensity.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiac dysrhythmias</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Electric Countershock</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0009-7322</issn><issn>1524-4539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkM1rGzEQxUVocN0055wKopTe1tHH7ko6FtMkhkAhpNCb0GpHtpLdlStpG_zfVyHGhzCHYZjfe8w8hK4oWVHa0mtCV-vNw0rJVSkiz9CSNqyu6oarD2hJCFGV4Ix9RJ9Seipjy0WzQAslmGgatkR_NuM-hn_QYz9liJMZcA_Od9EPg8k-TDjN1kJK-MXnHU67YJ8Tzn4sihxw3gEeQ9zvwhC2BwwD2BzDNprxMzp3ZkhweewX6PfNz8f1XXX_63az_nFf2ZqpXNWcSUlETw2p69a6ToJwoheMtxwkFdAz0lpKWCdd1wEY13NHTN9JA2Cd5Rfo-5tveePvDCnr0ScL5foJwpy04IrVVKoCfn0HPoX59eGkGWWCScp5ga7fIBtDShGc3kc_mnjQlOjXwDWhugSuldSliCyKL0fbuSuhnPhjwmX_7bg3yZrBRTNZn04Y441QkvD_xoyKSg</recordid><startdate>19980825</startdate><enddate>19980825</enddate><creator>HSU, W</creator><creator>YAYUN LIN</creator><creator>LANG, D. J</creator><creator>JONES, J. L</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><general>American Heart Association, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980825</creationdate><title>Improved internal defibrillation success with shocks timed to the morphology electrogram</title><author>HSU, W ; YAYUN LIN ; LANG, D. J ; JONES, J. L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-4328807d1a0446cfb8e7f7d72363e817ed206c102b8fbbeeafd3f0adb8aeecfc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiac dysrhythmias</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Electric Countershock</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HSU, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YAYUN LIN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LANG, D. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JONES, J. L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HSU, W</au><au>YAYUN LIN</au><au>LANG, D. J</au><au>JONES, J. L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improved internal defibrillation success with shocks timed to the morphology electrogram</atitle><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><date>1998-08-25</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>808</spage><epage>812</epage><pages>808-812</pages><issn>0009-7322</issn><eissn>1524-4539</eissn><coden>CIRCAZ</coden><abstract>A previous retrospective study by our group suggested that shocks timed to the upslope of the shocking lead electrogram improved defibrillation efficacy. The goal of this study was to prospectively determine whether defibrillation threshold could be reduced by use of an algorithm that timed shocks to the upslope of coarse ventricular fibrillation (test treatment) compared with shocks delivered asynchronously after 10 seconds of fibrillation (control treatment). Ten pigs were instrumented with a 3-lead system for internal defibrillation. Initial estimates of the energy required to achieve defibrillation E50 for both treatments were made by an up/down method. Subsequently, additional shocks at V50+/-10% and V50-20% were given for each treatment to obtain data points at higher and lower intensities. Probability-of-success curves were estimated for both treatments by the best-fit method. Energies required were significantly lower for the timed shocks than for the asynchronous shocks (P&lt;0.00 1). E80 was reduced 15.5%, from 27.1+/-2.5 to 22.9+/-1.8 J (P&lt;0.002). The width of the probability-of-success curve (E80-E20) for the test treatment was also significantly narrower than that for the control treatment (7.1+/-0.9 versus 10.8+/-1.7, P&lt;0.01). Normalized curve width (E80-E20)/E50 was decreased from 51+/-5% of E50 for control shocks to 37+/-4% of E50 for synchronous shocks (P&lt;0.02). In this model, defibrillation threshold is lower and more deterministic when shocks are timed to the upslope of the shocking lead electrogram. If a similar reduction is observed in humans, shock timing may lower defibrillation threshold and simplify programming of shock intensity.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>9727552</pmid><doi>10.1161/01.CIR.98.8.808</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-7322
ispartof Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 1998-08, Vol.98 (8), p.808-812
issn 0009-7322
1524-4539
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73924189
source MEDLINE; American Heart Association Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload
subjects Algorithms
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiac dysrhythmias
Cardiology. Vascular system
Electric Countershock
Electrocardiography
Electrodes
Heart
Medical sciences
Probability
Prospective Studies
Swine
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
title Improved internal defibrillation success with shocks timed to the morphology electrogram
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T01%3A54%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improved%20internal%20defibrillation%20success%20with%20shocks%20timed%20to%20the%20morphology%20electrogram&rft.jtitle=Circulation%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=HSU,%20W&rft.date=1998-08-25&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=808&rft.epage=812&rft.pages=808-812&rft.issn=0009-7322&rft.eissn=1524-4539&rft.coden=CIRCAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/01.CIR.98.8.808&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E33416977%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212728133&rft_id=info:pmid/9727552&rfr_iscdi=true