Measuring and Evaluating Hospital Restructuring Efforts: Eighteen-Month Follow-Up and Extension to Critical Care, Part 1

Increasingly, hospital restructuring is viewed with skepticism because of a lack of systematic and rigorous evaluation of its impact on quality of care. This first article in a two-part series describes comprehensive evaluation of the effects of hospital restructuring on patient satisfaction, nurse...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of nursing administration 1998-09, Vol.28 (9), p.21-27
Hauptverfasser: Bryan, Yvonne E., Hitchings, Kim S., Fuss, Mae Ann, Fox, Mary Agnes, Kinneman, Mary T., Young, Mark J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Increasingly, hospital restructuring is viewed with skepticism because of a lack of systematic and rigorous evaluation of its impact on quality of care. This first article in a two-part series describes comprehensive evaluation of the effects of hospital restructuring on patient satisfaction, nurse satisfaction, costs of care, and clinical quality on four medical-surgical units at a large tertiary hospital. In addition, early application of the model to critical care is described. A quasiexperimental pre- and post-design combined with concurrent control units for selected measures was the overall strategy. The authors conclude that comprehensive restructuring of hospital-based care can take place in a manner that preserves multiple dimensions of quality while decreasing costs. This only can be ascertained, however, through rigorous and systematic measurement and evaluation. Part 2 will detail application and evaluation of the restructuring model in the critical care environment.
ISSN:0002-0443
1539-0721
DOI:10.1097/00005110-199809000-00006