Family problem solving versus home notes as early intervention with high-risk children

Assigned 69 2nd-6th graders, identified as inconsistent because of extreme variability over baseline in math class work, to a home-note, family problem-solving, or control condition. Teachers scored Ss' math daily and sent home a Good-News Note with Ss in both intervention conditions when their daily means equaled or exceeded their baseline means. Ss in the family problem-solving condition wrote contingency contracts with their families, guided by a problem-solving board game, specifying consequences for receipt of Good-News Notes. Families in the home-note condition were instructed by letter to deliver favorable consequences on receipt of Good-News Notes. Compared to no treatment both forms of intervention significantly reduced class work scatter. Whereas Ss in the control and home-note conditions became less accurate during intervention, Ss in the family problem-solving condition maintained their accuracy. Only Ss in the family problem-solving condition demonstrated generalization to nonreinforced intervention probes. Involvement of the family meant that children produced high quality work even when their classmates' work dropped in quality and that they worked hard even when they expected no reward. (9 ref)