The systemic immune response is more prominent than the mucosal immune response in the pathogenesis of periodontal disease

Background, aim: The diseased periodontium appears to express features of a systemic and a mucosal immune response. Our aims were to determine differences in immunoglobulin expression between gingivitis and periodontitis lesions and to ascertain whether immune and inflammatory cells were recruited into the diseased periodontium by the mucosal addressin adhesion molecule (MAdCAM‐1). Methods: In situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry were used to detect the expression of chemokines, adhesion molecules and immunoglobulins in tissue sections of gingival and granulation tissues excised from periodontitis‐affected sites and of healthy tissue and gingivitis‐affected tissue excised during crown‐lengthening procedures. Results: Greater numbers of plasma cells were observed in periodontitis gingival/granulation tissue lesions compared with gingivitis lesions. While IgA1 were predominant in all lesions, IgA2 and J‐chain expressing plasma cells were present in increased proportions in gingival tissues compared with granulation tissue. Intracellular adhesion molecule‐1 (ICAM‐1) was higher in periodontitis than in gingivitis and interleukin‐8 mRNA was higher in lesions with a pronounced neutrophil infiltrate. Vascular cell adhesion molecule‐1 (VCAM‐1) localized to the deep connective tissue and indicated the presence of a systemic type of immune response in this region. Periodontal tissues (n=71 biopsies) did not appear to express MAdCAM‐1, in positive control sections of small intestine where it was detected. Conclusion: Overall, the systemic‐type immune response is predominant, and although the mucosal immune response is minor and limited to the superficial tissues it may have an important role in the host defense to periodontal pathogens. Zusammenfassung Grundlagen, Ziel: Es scheint, dass das erkrankte Parodontium die Merkmale einer systemischen und einer mukosalen Immunantwort aufweist. Unsere Ziele waren, die Unterschiede in der Immunglobulin‐Expression zwischen Gingivitis und Parodontitis zu bestimmen und festzustellen, ob die Immun‐ und Entzündungszellen durch die mukosalen Addressin‐Adhäsionsmoleküle (MAdCAM‐1) in das erkrankte Parodontium rekrutiert werden. Methoden: Die in situ‐Hybridisierung und die Immunhistochemie wurden verwendet, um in Gewebeschnitten des Gingiva‐ und Granulationsgewebes, die von mit Parodontitis befallenen Stellen und von gesunden Gewebe sowie von Stellen mit Gingivitis während einer Maßnahme zur Kronenverlängerung exzidiert wur