Lyt phenotype analysis of the effector cells responsible for evoking lymphocyte-induced angiogenesis (LIA)
Lymphocyte-induced angiogenesis (LIA) is a vascular response observed when allogeneic or semiallogeneic immunocompetent lymphocytes are inoculated intradermally into immunosuppressed or irradiated host mice. The reported experiments were carried out to characterize the effector cell population(s) re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cellular immunology 1981-09, Vol.63 (2), p.272-278 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Lymphocyte-induced angiogenesis (LIA) is a vascular response observed when allogeneic or semiallogeneic immunocompetent lymphocytes are inoculated intradermally into immunosuppressed or irradiated host mice. The reported experiments were carried out to characterize the effector cell population(s) responsible for causing LIA. Lyt 1.2, Lyt 2.2, and monoclonal Thy 1.2 antisera were used for negative selection with complement (C′) to investigate the ability of selected subsets of lymphocytes to evoke angiogenesis. Treatment of C57BL/6 spleen cells with either anti-Lyt 1.2 or anti-Thy 1.2 and C′ resulted in an almost complete abrogation of the LIA reaction. In contrast, depletion of Lyt 2+ cells, under conditions which fully abrogated their ability to generate cell-mediated cytotoxicity in allogeneic mixed leukocyte cultures, resulted only in a partial (45%) reduction in the induced vascular response. Synergistic interaction between cell preparations treated separately with either anti-Lyt 1.2 or anti-Lyt 2.2 serum was not observed. We conclude that (i) Lyt 1 + 2−T lymphocytes can induce a significant LIA reaction; (ii) lymphocytes resistant to negative selection with anti-Lyt-1.2 serum are incapable of inducing such a reaction; and (iii) Lyt 1 + 2+ cells directly or indirectly play an additional role in generating a maximal LIA response. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0008-8749 1090-2163 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0008-8749(81)90006-X |