Humalog® Mix50™ before carbohydrate-rich meals in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Aim:  To compare pre‐meal injection of Humalog® Mix50™ (Mix50) and Humalog® Mix25™ (Humalog® Mix75/25™ in the US; Mix25) with respect to 2 h postprandial (2 h pp) blood glucose (BG) control after a carbohydrate‐rich breakfast in patients with type 2 diabetes. Research Design and Methods:  One hundre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes, obesity & metabolism obesity & metabolism, 2003-09, Vol.5 (5), p.311-316
Hauptverfasser: Roach, P., Arora, V., Campaigne, B. N., Mattoo, V., Rangwala, S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aim:  To compare pre‐meal injection of Humalog® Mix50™ (Mix50) and Humalog® Mix25™ (Humalog® Mix75/25™ in the US; Mix25) with respect to 2 h postprandial (2 h pp) blood glucose (BG) control after a carbohydrate‐rich breakfast in patients with type 2 diabetes. Research Design and Methods:  One hundred and sixteen patients were enrolled in a 16‐week crossover trial and received two treatment regimens in a randomized crossover fashion: (i) Mix50 before breakfast and Mix25 before the evening meal (Mix50/Mix25) and (ii) Mix25 before both breakfast and the evening meal (Mix25 twice daily). Insulin doses were adjusted according to stated glycaemic targets. After 6 and 8 weeks of treatment, the patient's usual morning insulin dose was administered, followed immediately by a test breakfast representative of the patient's usual breakfast meal. Fasting and 2 h pp BG concentrations were measured at the time of the test meal. Haemoglobin A1c (A1C) was measured, and information regarding hypoglycaemia (symptoms) was collected at the end of each treatment period. Results:  Insulin doses were similar between treatments (morning = 31–33 U, evening = 26–28 U) at endpoint. Following the test breakfast, the 2 h pp BG was lower (10.9 ± 0.3 mmol/l vs. 12.4 ± 0.3 mmol/l, p = 0.0012) and the 2 h pp BG excursion was smaller (1.4 ± 0.28 mmol/l vs. 3.5 ± 0.28 mmol/l, p 
ISSN:1462-8902
1463-1326
DOI:10.1046/j.1463-1326.2003.00277.x