Intrauterine Device Failure: Relation to its Location Within the Uterine Cavity
OBJECTIVE:To investigate the possible role of position of the intrauterine device (IUD) in accidental pregnancies. METHODS:We examined the location of the IUD in 97 normal women 45-60 days post-insertion, and in 25 pregnant women with the device in situ. RESULTS:A cervically located IUD was identifi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) 1993-01, Vol.81 (1), p.112-114 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | OBJECTIVE:To investigate the possible role of position of the intrauterine device (IUD) in accidental pregnancies.
METHODS:We examined the location of the IUD in 97 normal women 45-60 days post-insertion, and in 25 pregnant women with the device in situ.
RESULTS:A cervically located IUD was identified in seven of 97 women (7.2%) after insertion and in 13 of 25 pregnant women (52%) with the device in situ. The odds ratio for a woman with an intracervical IUD to be pregnant compared with a woman with an IUD in the uterus was 13.93 (95% confidence limits 4.13-48.96). Sonographic follow-up of the pregnant women revealed no change in IUD location during early gestation.
CONCLUSIONS:We suggest that cases of failed contraceptive action of the IUD may be secondary to a malpositioned device. A sonographic survey can identify displaced devices. Reinsertion of the IUD in such cases is recommended. (Obstet Gynecol 1993;81:112-4) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0029-7844 1873-233X |