Kimura's disease and angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia: Clinical and histopathologic differences
Background: There has been considerable controversy about the relation between Kimura's disease and angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia (ALHE). Objective: We describe the clinical and histopathologic differences between the two diseases. Methods: We reviewed clinical findings and histop...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 1992-12, Vol.27 (6), p.954-958 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background:
There has been considerable controversy about the relation between Kimura's disease and angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia (ALHE).
Objective:
We describe the clinical and histopathologic differences between the two diseases.
Methods:
We reviewed clinical findings and histopathologic changes in two cases of Kimura's disease and three cases of ALHE.
Results:
Kimura's disease shows typical lymphoid follicles. It is associated with lymphade-nopathy and is always accompanied by peripheral eosinophilia. ALHE shows typical changes in endothelial cells. It is characterized by superficial papules or nodules with no lymphade-nopathy and is less frequently accompanied by peripheral eosinophilia.
Conclusion:
Kimura's disease and ALHE are separate entities. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0190-9622 1097-6787 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0190-9622(92)70293-O |