Relocation of Children After Divorce and Children's Best Interests: New Evidence and Legal Considerations
Relocation cases, in which a divorced parent seeks to move away with the child, are among the knottiest problems facing family courts. The recent trend is to permit such moves, largely because of Wallerstein's (1995) controversial amica curiae brief, which a recent court ( Baures v. Lewis, 2001...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of family psychology 2003-06, Vol.17 (2), p.206-219 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Relocation cases, in which a divorced parent seeks to move away with the child, are among the knottiest problems facing family courts. The recent trend is to permit such moves, largely because of Wallerstein's (1995) controversial
amica curiae
brief, which a recent court (
Baures v. Lewis,
2001
) interpreted as supporting the conclusion that "in general, what is good for the custodial parent is good for the child" (p. 222). The current study provides the first direct evidence on relocation by dividing college students into groups on the basis of their divorced parents' move-away status. On most child outcomes, the ones whose parents moved are significantly disadvantaged. This suggests courts should give greater weight to the child's separate interests in deciding such cases. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0893-3200 1939-1293 |
DOI: | 10.1037/0893-3200.17.2.206 |