Timolol 0.5%/dorzolamide 2% fixed combination versus timolol 0.5%/pilocarpine 2% fixed combination in primary open‐angle glaucoma or ocular hypertensive patients
. Purpose: To establish the efficacy and safety of timolol maleate/dorzolamide fixed combination (TDFC) versus timolol maleate/pilocarpine fixed combination (TPFC), each given twice daily, in primary open‐angle glaucoma or ocular hypertensive patients. Methods: In this prospective, multicentred, d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica 2003-08, Vol.81 (4), p.349-354 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | .
Purpose: To establish the efficacy and safety of timolol maleate/dorzolamide fixed combination (TDFC) versus timolol maleate/pilocarpine fixed combination (TPFC), each given twice daily, in primary open‐angle glaucoma or ocular hypertensive patients.
Methods: In this prospective, multicentred, double‐masked trial, 37 patients were treated twice daily with timolol for 4 weeks. They were then randomized to one of the treatment medications for 6 weeks, after which they were treated with timolol again for 2 weeks before being placed on the opposite treatment medication for 6 weeks.
Results: A total of 36 patients completed the trial. Their mean baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) was 22.3 ± 3.7 mmHg. Following 6 weeks of treatment, the mean trough (08.00 hours) IOP was 18.0 ± 2.2 mmHg for TDFC and 17.4 ± 2.0 mmHg for TPFC (p = 0.22). The mean diurnal curve IOP was 18.1 ± 2.2 mmHg for TDFC and 16.7 ± 1.9 mmHg for TPFC (p = 0.0007). At the remaining time‐points (10.00, 18.00 and 20.00 hours), TPFC IOPs were statistically lower than TDFC IOPs (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1395-3907 1600-0420 |
DOI: | 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2003.00097.x |