Post Office Box Addresses: A Challenge for Geographic Information System-Based Studies
Background: Geographic information system (GIS)-based health studies require information on the physical location of data points, such as subject addresses. In a study of California women diagnosed with breast cancer between 1988 and 1997, we needed to locate the residential addresses of 4,537 women...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) Mass.), 2003-07, Vol.14 (4), p.386-391 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Geographic information system (GIS)-based health studies require information on the physical location of data points, such as subject addresses. In a study of California women diagnosed with breast cancer between 1988 and 1997, we needed to locate the residential addresses of 4,537 women with post office boxes (POBs). Methods: We investigated the feasibility of tracing street addresses for the POBs and examined potential selection biases and case attribute misclassifications introduced by different methods of handling POBs in GIS-based health studies. Results: Our tracing method yielded street addresses for only 34% of POBs in our study. Examination of subjects' case characteristics revealed that boxholders were not representative of the full population. Geocoding using a POB's delivery-weighted five-digit zip code centroid, as a proxy for street address, resulted in case attribute misclassification for 81% of boxholders. Conclusions: Disease registries should modernize their infrastructure to complement GIS technologies. Epidemiologists should understand GIS data limitations and consider potential biases introduced by incomplete or inaccurate geocoding. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1044-3983 1531-5487 |
DOI: | 10.1097/01.EDE.0000073161.66729.89 |