Uterine Response to Infectious Bacteria in Estrous Cyclic Ewes
PROBLEM: Luteal‐phase uteri are susceptible to infections, and PGE2 and exogenous progesterone can down‐regulate, whereas PGF2α can up‐regulate, uterine immune functions. METHOD OF STUDY: Uteri of follicular‐ or luteal‐phase ewes were inoculated with either saline or bacteria (Arcanobacterium pyogen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of reproductive immunology (1989) 2003-05, Vol.49 (5), p.269-278 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | PROBLEM: Luteal‐phase uteri are susceptible to infections, and PGE2 and exogenous progesterone can down‐regulate, whereas PGF2α can up‐regulate, uterine immune functions.
METHOD OF STUDY: Uteri of follicular‐ or luteal‐phase ewes were inoculated with either saline or bacteria (Arcanobacterium pyogenes and Escherichia coli). Vena caval blood was collected for the next 3 days, and progesterone, PGE2, and PGF2α were measured. The effects of 10−7 m PGE2 (Experiment 1), 10−7 m PGF2α (Experiment 2), 10−7 m indomethacin (INDO), and diluent on proliferation of lymphocytes from the vena caval blood in response to mitogens was quantified.
RESULTS: Experiment 1: Progesterone was greater (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1046-7408 8755-8920 1600-0897 |
DOI: | 10.1034/j.1600-0897.2003.00039.x |