Studies of exclusion in individuals with severe mental retardation

Exclusion performances in matching to sample are demonstrated when subjects select experimentally undefined comparison stimuli in the presence of undefined sample stimuli, apparently by rejecting defined comparison stimuli. Several studies have documented exclusion performances in a small number of individuals with severe mental retardation. These studies also demonstrated the potential of exclusion procedures for establishing prerequisites for emergent naming performances. The present study examined exclusion in a larger cohort of subjects. Initial experiments asked two questions. First, how reliably would exclusion performances be demonstrated? Second, would those performances be followed by emergent naming, and if so, how reliably? Follow-up experiments examined the stimulus control basis for exclusion performances. Our findings and conclusions can be summarized as follows: First, reliable exclusion was demonstrated in nearly all subjects. Second, naming performances typically emerged. These performances were seen in the context of a recent experimental history of matching to sample and of naming baseline stimuli in the experimental format. Third, apparent exclusion may sometimes result from relating undefined sample and comparison stimuli. Together, our findings suggest potentially effective strategies for teaching people with mental retardation and point to variables that should be considered when designing exclusion-based teaching interventions.