The transverse myocutaneous gracilis flap: technical refinements

Summary Autologous free tissue transfer is an ideal method for breast reconstruction. The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is considered the gold-standard procedure worldwide. However, in selected patients this flap cannot be performed to achieve satisfactory outcomes. The transverse...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2010-02, Vol.63 (2), p.305-313
Hauptverfasser: Fattah, Adel, Figus, Andrea, Mathur, Bhagwat, Ramakrishnan, Venkat V
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Autologous free tissue transfer is an ideal method for breast reconstruction. The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is considered the gold-standard procedure worldwide. However, in selected patients this flap cannot be performed to achieve satisfactory outcomes. The transverse myocutaneous gracilis (TMG) flap is one of the most recent additions to the armamentarium of breast-reconstructive surgeons. This flap can provide adequate autologous tissue with a hidden scar. Since its description for breast reconstruction in 2004, no series have been published and its recognition is still lacking. The main criticism of this flap is the lack of volume that can be achieved and the potential for donor morbidity. We report upon a 2-year experience with the use of TMG flaps for breast reconstruction, assessing the potential indications and introducing some technical refinements in order to expand the role of this flap in breast reconstruction. Materials and methods Information regarding all TMG flaps performed in the period between January 2006 and December 2007 was prospectively collected. Indications and outcomes were reviewed. The surgical technique was revised and standardised to achieve a routine set-up. Results During the study period, 19 TMG flaps were performed in 12 patients (seven double procedures: five bilateral cases and two stacked flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction). One flap was lost 9 days postoperatively. Follow-up ranged from 6 months to 2 years. We detail our surgical technique and describe refinements to speed up flap harvest, increase flap volume, optimise flap inset and minimise donor-site complications. Conclusion Although the DIEP flap is still our preferred choice for breast reconstruction, the TMG flap is suitable as a first-line option in small-to-moderate breasted women or as a second-line choice for larger-breasted women for whom the DIEP flap may not be the preferred choice. It is also a reliable salvage flap in cases of previous flap failure.
ISSN:1748-6815
1878-0539
DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2008.10.015